Player topic: Eliaquim Mangala (2014/15)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Mangala

Gaudion M said:
mosssideblue said:
OB1 said:
I really don't know if you are right or wrong about Kolarov and high work rate teams but he has too many games where he defends poorly and today was a definite example of that. Our weaknesses at LB do cause problems for the LCB and Manga did suffer when having to defend out wide. However, I think he is getting rather too much stick for today's performance.

I'm with you. I like Eli and think he is starting to show signs of settling in. It gets difficult for him when the LB is having a mare and he feels the need to go that extra mile to cover their arses. I wouldn't be surprised to see a LB on our shopping list.

The games were Mangala looks poor are the ones were the opposition are playing well down their right / our left. If you think back to Hull they had a spell were it was all coming down our left (I think it was Clichy at LB then) and Mangala starts to look rash and clumsy although anyone who has played CB knows if your full back is getting skinned you have to slide over and more often than not you end up in a poor position and leaving the near post exposed.

I think the issue Managala has is we don’t have a reliable LB or left sided midfielder who makes that side of our formation secure. We often put Nasri or Silva on the left and they like to move in toward the ball, on top of that our full backs are expected to push on and that leaves a big gap. It is less of a problem on the right as Zab is excellent and we tend to have Navas or Milner on the right who work well with Zab (expecting him to overlap and tracking back to help when he does). On the left it is a different story although recently when Clichy has played well Mangala has looked really solid. I think he was really affected by Kolarov’s performance yesterday.

I would bring Clichy back in and if anything use Kolarov as a left sided midfielder to sure up the formation when we need it.

Throw in West Ham away as well where Clichy's poor form left Mangala in trouble on more than one occasion.
 
Re: Mangala

I think he's had a poor Christmas. Yesterday was the game that people will notice but he had a bit of a shocker against West Brom too. There were countless occasions where he was completely at a loss regarding Berahino's movement, as he was caught square on. We need Vinny back soon in order to give the lad a rest.
 
Re: Mangala

tolmie's hairdoo said:
He was shocking yesterday, although Kolarov's indifference to the actual proceedings certainly won't have helped.

I do think we do have to be careful here. There are plenty who seem convinced Eliaquim will go on to become one of Europe's best. His debut against Chelsea would certainly point towards that.

However, I am genuinely shocked at how lacking he is, allied to his actual cost, in terms of the basic fundamentals.

His strength and aerial prowess should be the bare minimum from someone required in his position, but even that what sadly shown up by a journeyman player yesterday.

Never goal side, and from the majority of set-pieces, he allows his man acres of space to get the jump on him.

What I mean in terms of blues being careful?

I convinced myself for years that big money buys such as Bradbury, Balotelli, Taylor, Macken, Adebayor, would all come good.

It simply prejudiced what I could actually see with my eyes, but I wouldn't have it. They were never really up to it in the first place.

I'm not seeing nearly enough from Mangala, at present, to suggest he is going to be the world beater I assumed he was going to be for the price.

No doubt, he will improve, he surely has to? (that's my caveat right there ;)

But I have to remain a sceptic that he will go on to absolutely destroy the burden of his price tag, based on some shortcomings I would expect any defender, young or old, to be able to perform as a matter of course.

I do think Damocles makes a great point about the left back issue, although Demichelis eventually had to swap with Mangala due to him being bullied by Hughes both in the air and the ground.

I may also be mistaken, but from my vantage, Mangala was also the player who caught Zabba, simply by his rashness to clear, when Hart was fouled?

I agree with almost every word. The word raw is an understatement for Mangala, although Kolarov's disappearing act didn't help at all yesterday, allowing Burnley's lumpen forwards to pull both of our centre halves out into very uncomfortable areas. I think what concerns me most with Mangala -and I appreciate that others on here, whose opinions I respect, view it differently - is not just his rashness and lack of judgment at times (2 sendings off already, and lucky not to be a third against Everton), but that he's got a touch of the Micah's about him when in possession. It's laudable that he is trying to bring the ball out from the back, but several times I've seen a heavy first touch result in him over-running the ball into the oppositions midfield players, and my own default sensation when I see him in possession is that he makes me 'nervous'. He's obviously got attributes, he will obviously improve, but at the moment I'm far from convinced we'll ever get anything close to value for money out of the lad. Hope I'm wrong.
 
Re: Mangala

Bluewonder said:
I think he's had a poor Christmas. Yesterday was the game that people will notice but he had a bit of a shocker against West Brom too. There were countless occasions where he was completely at a loss regarding Berahino's movement, as he was caught square on. We need Vinny back soon in order to give the lad a rest.

As was MDM
 
Re: Mangala

jollylescott said:
^ A belated Merry Xmas Tolm.

It is a huge concern that there are so many deficiencies in his game. He seems to be lacking the natural positional awareness of a top class defender. As you said he allowed far too much space to his opponent and he gave away some very naive free kicks in dangerous positions.

As one person said yesterday there was an element of Bambi on ice. Eli is very awkward and doesn't appear to have the co-ordination and defensive sixth sense which should be expected from a 32 million purchase.

Of course all these elements can be worked upon, and he is still very young for a central defender. However 32 mill is a helluva lot of money and for that investment we need the best of the best.

It would be interesting to know Khaldoon's thoughts after the game. I am sure there would have been some very interesting conversations taking place behind the scenes!


And also you, bud.

I don't think anyone thought we were purchasing the finished article?

But surely someone who can already make actual use of his physical attributes, both from an aerial standpoint and when touch-tight?

He's not even winning the majority of his personal battles. People were quick to slag off Demichelis, last season, but I was always impressed by him because he was attempting to do the right things, in spite of a national witch hunt that had plenty of our own eating it up.

It may come across that I am being hyper-critical of Eliaquim, and he has been the first to admit it has been a struggle.

Whereas Demichelis had that experience to continue to do the right things, even when they went wrong, Mangala does not have that luxury.

I do hope we back the lad with the addition of a proper left-back.
 
Re: Mangala

tolmie's hairdoo said:
jollylescott said:
^ A belated Merry Xmas Tolm.

It is a huge concern that there are so many deficiencies in his game. He seems to be lacking the natural positional awareness of a top class defender. As you said he allowed far too much space to his opponent and he gave away some very naive free kicks in dangerous positions.

As one person said yesterday there was an element of Bambi on ice. Eli is very awkward and doesn't appear to have the co-ordination and defensive sixth sense which should be expected from a 32 million purchase.

Of course all these elements can be worked upon, and he is still very young for a central defender. However 32 mill is a helluva lot of money and for that investment we need the best of the best.

It would be interesting to know Khaldoon's thoughts after the game. I am sure there would have been some very interesting conversations taking place behind the scenes!


And also you, bud.

I don't think anyone thought we were purchasing the finished article?

But surely someone who can already make actual use of his physical attributes, both from an aerial standpoint and when touch-tight?

He's not even winning the majority of his personal battles. People were quick to slag off Demichelis, last season, but I was always impressed by him because he was attempting to do the right things, in spite of a national witch hunt that had plenty of our own eating it up.

It may come across that I am being hyper-critical of Eliaquim, and he has been the first to admit it has been a struggle.

Whereas Demichelis had that experience to continue to do the right things, even when they went wrong, Mangala does not have that luxury.

I do hope we back the lad with the addition of a proper left-back.

I sometimes feel like I watch completely different games to others. Yesterday he was unprotected because Kolarov was abysmal and as a result Mangala struggled (along with MD). Baring in mind that it was his 2nd game in 48 hours and his 6th or 7th in quick succession he's allowed a little dip in performance.

When I read the criticisms of his overall defending (positioning, aerial prowess, reading of the game, etc) it's where I become lost in terms of whether we watch different players. For me, Mangala is already a top centre half and one of the top five in the PL. He is literally a million miles ahead of the dross they have at United, Arsenal, Liverpool, and isn't behind Cahill.

Price tags are irrelevant as you and I both know Tolm ... Fernandinho was overpriced when we bought him but worth every penny by the end of last season.
 
Re: Mangala

Mister Appointment said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
jollylescott said:
^ A belated Merry Xmas Tolm.

It is a huge concern that there are so many deficiencies in his game. He seems to be lacking the natural positional awareness of a top class defender. As you said he allowed far too much space to his opponent and he gave away some very naive free kicks in dangerous positions.

As one person said yesterday there was an element of Bambi on ice. Eli is very awkward and doesn't appear to have the co-ordination and defensive sixth sense which should be expected from a 32 million purchase.

Of course all these elements can be worked upon, and he is still very young for a central defender. However 32 mill is a helluva lot of money and for that investment we need the best of the best.

It would be interesting to know Khaldoon's thoughts after the game. I am sure there would have been some very interesting conversations taking place behind the scenes!


And also you, bud.

I don't think anyone thought we were purchasing the finished article?

But surely someone who can already make actual use of his physical attributes, both from an aerial standpoint and when touch-tight?

He's not even winning the majority of his personal battles. People were quick to slag off Demichelis, last season, but I was always impressed by him because he was attempting to do the right things, in spite of a national witch hunt that had plenty of our own eating it up.

It may come across that I am being hyper-critical of Eliaquim, and he has been the first to admit it has been a struggle.

Whereas Demichelis had that experience to continue to do the right things, even when they went wrong, Mangala does not have that luxury.

I do hope we back the lad with the addition of a proper left-back.

I sometimes feel like I watch completely different games to others. Yesterday he was unprotected because Kolarov was abysmal and as a result Mangala struggled (along with MD). Baring in mind that it was his 2nd game in 48 hours and his 6th or 7th in quick succession he's allowed a little dip in performance.

When I read the criticisms of his overall defending (positioning, aerial prowess, reading of the game, etc) it's where I become lost in terms of whether we watch different players. For me, Mangala is already a top centre half and one of the top five in the PL. He is literally a million miles ahead of the dross they have at United, Arsenal, Liverpool, and isn't behind Cahill.

Price tags are irrelevant as you and I both know Tolm ... Fernandinho was overpriced when we bought him but worth every penny by the end of last season.

Gets me why people have to point out every negative with a player, he did some excellent things yesterday was naive with one or two challenges on Barnes who was backing in and making a back for him every time , he also made a couple of mistakesc
 
Re: Mangala

tolmie's hairdoo said:
He was shocking yesterday, although Kolarov's indifference to the actual proceedings certainly won't have helped.

I do think we do have to be careful here. There are plenty who seem convinced Eliaquim will go on to become one of Europe's best. His debut against Chelsea would certainly point towards that.

However, I am genuinely shocked at how lacking he is, allied to his actual cost, in terms of the basic fundamentals.

His strength and aerial prowess should be the bare minimum from someone required in his position, but even that what sadly shown up by a journeyman player yesterday.

Never goal side, and from the majority of set-pieces, he allows his man acres of space to get the jump on him.

What I mean in terms of blues being careful?

I convinced myself for years that big money buys such as Bradbury, Balotelli, Taylor, Macken, Adebayor, would all come good.

It simply prejudiced what I could actually see with my eyes, but I wouldn't have it. They were never really up to it in the first place.

I'm not seeing nearly enough from Mangala, at present, to suggest he is going to be the world beater I assumed he was going to be for the price.

No doubt, he will improve, he surely has to? (that's my caveat right there ;)

But I have to remain a sceptic that he will go on to absolutely destroy the burden of his price tag, based on some shortcomings I would expect any defender, young or old, to be able to perform as a matter of course.

I do think Damocles makes a great point about the left back issue, although Demichelis eventually had to swap with Mangala due to him being bullied by Barnes both in the air and on the ground.

I may also be mistaken, but from my vantage, Mangala was also the player who caught Zabba, simply by his rashness to clear, when Hart was fouled?

I prefer to remain on what I hope is the optimistic side of realistic but Txiki has form for buying an expensive pup of a CB so nothing is given and there is no reason to be complacent.

I do think they went as much for potential as finished product and there are some little good things that he does that you do not often see from centre backs. I think he is having a difficult transition to the English game but I think his problems have been magnified by his price tag and playing for the Champions; plus a set of supporters that unfortuantely loves a scapegoat.

He needs to calm down and think, he was indeed responsible for butting Zaba but at least he was reacting quickly to a situation; maybe too quickly in that case. I hope that experience will cure some of his rashness. I know he had me cursing him when he made one daft late foul.
 
Re: Mangala

Mister Appointment said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
jollylescott said:
^ A belated Merry Xmas Tolm.

It is a huge concern that there are so many deficiencies in his game. He seems to be lacking the natural positional awareness of a top class defender. As you said he allowed far too much space to his opponent and he gave away some very naive free kicks in dangerous positions.

As one person said yesterday there was an element of Bambi on ice. Eli is very awkward and doesn't appear to have the co-ordination and defensive sixth sense which should be expected from a 32 million purchase.

Of course all these elements can be worked upon, and he is still very young for a central defender. However 32 mill is a helluva lot of money and for that investment we need the best of the best.

It would be interesting to know Khaldoon's thoughts after the game. I am sure there would have been some very interesting conversations taking place behind the scenes!


And also you, bud.

I don't think anyone thought we were purchasing the finished article?

But surely someone who can already make actual use of his physical attributes, both from an aerial standpoint and when touch-tight?

He's not even winning the majority of his personal battles. People were quick to slag off Demichelis, last season, but I was always impressed by him because he was attempting to do the right things, in spite of a national witch hunt that had plenty of our own eating it up.

It may come across that I am being hyper-critical of Eliaquim, and he has been the first to admit it has been a struggle.

Whereas Demichelis had that experience to continue to do the right things, even when they went wrong, Mangala does not have that luxury.

I do hope we back the lad with the addition of a proper left-back.

I sometimes feel like I watch completely different games to others. Yesterday he was unprotected because Kolarov was abysmal and as a result Mangala struggled (along with MD). Baring in mind that it was his 2nd game in 48 hours and his 6th or 7th in quick succession he's allowed a little dip in performance.

When I read the criticisms of his overall defending (positioning, aerial prowess, reading of the game, etc) it's where I become lost in terms of whether we watch different players. For me, Mangala is already a top centre half and one of the top five in the PL. He is literally a million miles ahead of the dross they have at United, Arsenal, Liverpool, and isn't behind Cahill.

Price tags are irrelevant as you and I both know Tolm ... Fernandinho was overpriced when we bought him but worth every penny by the end of last season.


That French stream of yours must be buffering like fuck ;)

As I and others have stated, Kolarov did him no favours.

The game also started to turn after Fernando picked up a yellow card which basically rendered him impotent for the rest of the game, something the manager should have addressed after the hour.

United, Arsenal and Liverpool don't have any defender of note, so the comparison is lame, especially so, as we paid £32m for Mangala.

Cahill is still someone I thought we should have bought when we had the chance.

Mangala did not set the price but all I see is rashness and rawness in the extreme. He's treading water and yesterday, he was up against a nobody.

A bit like when a sub is subbed, you know things were bad when Demichelis elected to change sides in a bid to get their lads to stop targeting Eliaquim.

The player I saw bully Costa and stride out of defence is the one I still hope and expect to see over the next 12 months, but that was a very high benchmark.

I will settle for him doing the basics right at present.

As for Fernandinho, I did not consider him overpriced when United had paid £28m for Fellaini.
 
Re: Mangala

Not only the LB but our midfield is leaving both CB's exposed. I thought with both Ferdies yesterday it would be better but there was still numerous occasions when Burnley players were allowed to waltz through midfield right onto our CB's.

Also I'm not sure if it's down to fatigue but it was evident 5-6 games ago that we were actively pressing more. Last few games we have reverted to type - sitting off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.