True, but let's be fair here. We know where that ball is going because we've seen the replay. Mangala has to make a choice between running directly to his goalmouth, running straight towards the gap that's left, or following the player. He chose running towards the gap which he does every single bloody time no matter what.
Let's also be fair and say that 99 times out of 100 he made the right decision to pressure the defender with the ball an create an acute angle for the shot. Gomis' finish was ridiculous, that's an important thing to remember too.
But again, people are slagging him off for not successfully covering other people's mistakes. Those three players who I highlighted in the image have more more culpability for that goal than Mangala yet none of them are getting criticised as making the mistake because they aren't as visible. The left back facing the crowd for example rather than the pitch is infuriating; if he was alert he could have covered the side where the ball was an Mangala could have done exactly what he did and the danger would have been gone.
I agree here. Most of our conceded goals are put down to individual errors made by the person closest to the goal scorer, but in most cases there are fundamental problems further up the pitch which lead to these situations.
Firstly, I still think we try and manitain too much width with too few players when we have the ball. We stretch the pitch, but often with a midfield 2, and wingers which occupy roughly the same space as our full backs (when attacking) - especially so on the right hand side.
First off all, the distance between the players means our possession is often too slow, predictable and open to interceptions which then cause a transition. From a defensive view point, we lack any form of compactness which means we have no chance of counter pressing. We try to sporadically press but the pressing is rarely done as a team because this lack of compactness makes it impossible. So teams play through us, often through the middle of the pitch, which should never happen.
This normally leads to scenarios where our defenders have to react to a situation which is developing at high speed with the disadvantage of not knowing what the attacker is going to do. Kompany is excellent because of how aggressive he is and how great he is at reading play and timing tackles and interceptions (when fit). Otamendi is a good one vs one defender but his concentration and decision making is a bit off balance. Mangala is less aggressive in terms of making interceptions and often makes the mistake of allowing the opposition to shoot from what he believes to be a safe angle. Unfortunately for him, he's done this 3 times this season and 3 goals have come from it.
Now unless we clone Kompany (and keep them both fit - which might be harder), we will continue to be let down by our system, which we will then mistakingly blame on the centre backs. This will probably result in another £30m being spent on a defender without us really fixing the issue.
The issue lies with the manager in this case. He stresses attacking football as his philosophy and has a stubbornness to continue to play the same way regardless of the opposition. Against the better teams, the attacking side of our game is becoming less and less effective - especially now against more compact strikerless formations, and our defensive game and ability to handle turnovers in possession is taking a massive hit as well. We look outnumbered in both final thirds. We only really outnumber the oppisition in the wide areas of the attacking final third, but given our inability or lack of interest in crossing the ball, this advantage Is a false advantage. It doesn't benefit us that much.
I've gone off on a tangent defending Mangala here, but my point is we play a very flawed system and have done for a while now. In the past it only really got exposed at the top level, but now we are suffering against comparatively poorer teams. The pundits highlight the defenders and criticize their reactionary decision making, but the bigger problems are all over the pitch and as a team, we should be set up to minimise the amount of times our centre backs have to defend dangerous situations.