I'm by no means an ITK, but following up on several mentions yesterday that the lad had failed his medical last week, I've been told that it is true that he did indeed fail "our" medical, but that our medicals demand a much higher standard than other clubs.
Essentially, he met the standard that most clubs would demand, and it is in fact city who have had the change of heart, deciding to take a punt on an £8m signing who only "failed" by a fine margin.
Don't shoot the messenger, as I say, I'm just passing on what I've been told.
Since when are medicals pass or fail? They are just so the club knows more about the player, and clubs often buy injured and unfit players.