Player Topic: Kelechi Iheanacho (2015/16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A kid who showed 4 days ago he can play? Over David Silva?

Clarkie? OK, I bite. You got me :?

A kid who showed 4 days ago he can play? Over David Silva?

Clarkie? OK, I bite. You got me :?

Well if Pellegrini keeps doing the same thing every game then we can pretty much expect more of the same so don't be surprised when it happens again. He needs to do something because what he is doing now isn't working.
 
He won't be sticking around much longer if you ask me, he's been patient, respectful, worked his bollocks off to get in the team and get noticed but it's going unrewarded.

He will have plenty of suitors too
 
He won't be sticking around much longer if you ask me, he's been patient, respectful, worked his bollocks off to get in the team and get noticed but it's going unrewarded.

He will have plenty of suitors too

Nah, there's no problem there with Kelechi.

It's all the other kids who never get a sniff we should be worried about.
 
I too would like to see him used more.

However 15 appearances averaging 25 minutes an appearance halfway through a season isn't bad for someone cutting their teeth in senior football, granted some of those last minute sub appearances are frustrating.
 
Well if Pellegrini keeps doing the same thing every game then we can pretty much expect more of the same so don't be surprised when it happens again. He needs to do something because what he is doing now isn't working.
This is false though, is it not?

He has been changing things up a lot though.


So last three games:
1. Dihno, Yaya, Silva, Delph, KDB, Aguero
2. Nando, Delph, Sterling, Navas, Kelechi, Aguero
3.Nando, Yaya, Sterling, Navas, KDB, Aguero

Clearly, he is making changes and switching things up. Even the play dtylecis changing. There is a bit more of gengenpressing.

I get it, the whole 'Pep might be coming' has turned this place into a constant anti Pelegrini drivel. Any formation he comes up with, there are those who are moaning before a ballnis kicked in anger.

If it's not 'why is he picking Yaya' it is 'why is he not playing Kelechi' or 'Why Bony' or 'why not sub X at half?'

Funny enough, he has done all these things at different times. Subbed, someone at half, play Kelechi, not play Yaya. Etc.

Yet the results haven't been mega different outside of the strength or weaknesses of the opposition.

At some point folks will Simon have to get it. There is no magic elixir.
 
This is false though, is it not?

He has been changing things up a lot though.


So last three games:
1. Dihno, Yaya, Silva, Delph, KDB, Aguero
2. Nando, Delph, Sterling, Navas, Kelechi, Aguero
3.Nando, Yaya, Sterling, Navas, KDB, Aguero

Clearly, he is making changes and switching things up. Even the play dtylecis changing. There is a bit more of gengenpressing.

I get it, the whole 'Pep might be coming' has turned this place into a constant anti Pelegrini drivel. Any formation he comes up with, there are those who are moaning before a ballnis kicked in anger.

If it's not 'why is he picking Yaya' it is 'why is he not playing Kelechi' or 'Why Bony' or 'why not sub X at half?'

Funny enough, he has done all these things at different times. Subbed, someone at half, play Kelechi, not play Yaya. Etc.

Yet the results haven't been mega different outside of the strength or weaknesses of the opposition.

At some point folks will Simon have to get it. There is no magic elixir.

It's awful isn't it. Embarrassing from a moral perspective. I've had issues with some of Pellers' management aspects since he got here, but I've found that this Guardiola saga has made me more patient this season. Even my mother said to me, that I seem to take defeats much more maturely this season haha

P.S. I really wouldn't call it Gegenpressing as that's an insult to the concept haha, but I agree that we've showed signs of pressuring the ball carrier and passing lanes a little more than usual, recently (just after transition and in our own half.) I hope to see more of that. Against Everton, in our own half there was some heartening showings of concerted pressure on the ball. Not nearly enough, but a definite step in the right direction
 
Last edited:
Haha. "We should have brought on Nacho" is the most typical binary fan sentiment I've ever seen.

Fans like strikers. Fans like youth products. Fans think in binary "we need a goal=bring on a striker". Utter rubbish. It would have been madness to bring him on because the shape was working, we were playing football around their box, we were creating chances and our striker looked sharp. Silva was the right sub, to open them up with his magic, because they were defending deep and in numbers, and you could certainly have made a case for bringing him on earlier, but we were totally dominant with the personnel we had. I'd have brought on Kolorov for Clichy to give Sterling more of an overlap option late in the game. In the first half there was definitely a case for bringing on Delph for Yaya. There was no case at all in my mind for playing sterling off the striker in the first half and the swap with de Bruyne should have happened well before half time.

But at no point ever in last night's game would it have been sensible to bung another striker on like a desperate Sunday league team.
 
It's awful isn't it. Embarrassing from you moral perspective. I've had issues with some of Pellers' management aspects since he got here, but I've found that this Guardiola saga has made me more patient this season. Even my mother said to me, that I seem to take defeats much more maturely this season haha

P.S. I really wouldn't call it Gegenpressing as that's an insult to the concept haha, but I agree that we've showed signs of pressuring the ball carrier and passing lanes a little more than usual, recently (just after transition and in our own half.) I hope to see more of that. Against Everton, in our own half there was some heartening showings of concerted pressure on the ball. Not nearly enough, but a definite step in the right direction
Lol, my apologies. The hyperbole from the anti crew has gotten me all hyperbolic myself :)

I'm kinda in your boat. Didn't even want MP to start with. Didn't want Mancini fired, not because I particularly thought he was great, but because I didn't think there are that many good coaches.

In my opinion, coaching at the top has more to do with talent and built in credibility. So, either you get someone who has won a lot like Pep and Klopp, or you get a specialist like the crazy Chilean or Van Gaal, who tend to run their players into the ground.

Mourihno used to be in the Pep/Klopp category. Now he is more like Hindink/Ancelloti. Guys who have won and people respect. But by and large, the difference is talent, not coaching. Or how else would one describr the present manager of the year, Luis Enrique?

average at 2 stops, became the coach of a bunch of extremely talented players, and suddenly he seems like a genius. Crushing everyone and everything around. This is a guy half his board wanted to fire a mere 13 months ago.

So, i generally roll my eyes on manager discussions. I think managers are constantly overrated or underrated. They are mostly all average, with some bad ones sprayed in.

So while I'm all for Pep coming, the reason why I want him is mostly for his recruitment. Sure, he'd add some gengenpressing here, some tactical nuance there. But his greatest attribute will be the talent his clout brings to the club.

So until he arrives with all the best young talent in Germany, Spain, and England I support the present coach. Especially in light of the fact that he gets it right (as in doing what 95% of coaches in his position would have done.)

Managers live and die with their stars. Pelegrini will too. And I can't fault him for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.