Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Should of came on, no doubt about that.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Player Topic: Kelechi Iheanacho (2015/16)
- Thread starter BlueAnorak
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
But for whom? Aguero, Silva were looking pretty good, he wasn't going to come on wide for Sterling or Navas, we still only had two in central midfield, so they needed to stay on, and if he'd have come on for a defender Everton might have nabbed one at the end.Should of came on, no doubt about that.
I love seeing Nacho play, but it's got to be to improve our team. I think Pellegrini was right not to bring him on yesterday.
Haha I am aware that it's not a shot on target.
I can't recall any last ditch tackles?...A few good blocks though yes.
Was a clearish chance I guess but from about the penalty spot out it would of had to of been an awesome header to beat the keeper.
A free header 8 yards out in the centre of the goal is a clear chance, took a good stop from Howard to keep it out.
We created some decent opportunities in that second half, Everton defended brilliantly.
It is easy to drop to the floor and block a shot, yes. You just have to follow the man and read what he's going to do, especially when it's Sterling ever so predictably cutting inside (not having a pop so much at him as I thought he played well second half but he's so easy to read coming in from the left!).
Yaya's header was our most clear cut chance all game. The game lasted 93 minutes though and you're scratching your head for many others all game.
You're doing Everton a disservice, they defended brilliantly in that second half under almost constant pressure.
But for whom? Aguero, Silva were looking pretty good, he wasn't going to come on wide for Sterling or Navas, we still only had two in central midfield, so they needed to stay on, and if he'd have come on for a defender Everton might have nabbed one at the end.
I love seeing Nacho play, but it's got to be to improve our team. I think Pellegrini was right not to bring him on yesterday.
In my opinion, he should have came on for Navas and we should have then gone to a 442 with 1 side remaining wide and the other more fluid with David floating where he liked. We were getting chances but needed better finishers to get one past Howard. Navas was helping get our team into good positions in the final 3rd, but his crosses werent hitting the mark.
Maybe thats a risky strategy which opens us up for attack on Silva's side. Then again its a risk to not bring on another striker at home and drop 2 points in a tight battle for the league.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Why do you think he will start?Think he'll start on Saturday. We were playing well, no need to bring him on yesterday.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
But for whom? Aguero, Silva were looking pretty good, he wasn't going to come on wide for Sterling or Navas, we still only had two in central midfield, so they needed to stay on, and if he'd have come on for a defender Everton might have nabbed one at the end.
I love seeing Nacho play, but it's got to be to improve our team. I think Pellegrini was right not to bring him on yesterday.
We needed a goal. Kelechi scores nearly every time he's on the pitch. He shouldn't of just came off the bench, he should of started him.
No, Messi does that. Iheanacho has 5 in 15 appearances, a good few fleeting sub appearances but that still counts as being on the pitch.We needed a goal. Kelechi scores nearly every time he's on the pitch. He shouldn't of just came off the bench, he should of started him.
And it's "have", he should "have".
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
No, Messi does that. Iheanacho has 5 in 15 appearances, a good few fleeting sub appearances but that still counts as being on the pitch.
And it's "have", he should "have".
His goal ratio tells the real story.
Correcting someone's grammar on a forum, sad.
So it's not "nearly every time he's on the pitch" anymore, it's the goal ratio, OK.His goal ratio tells the real story.
Correcting someone's grammar on a forum, sad.
I fail to see how it's any sadder than all the moaning that goes on. Like at the manager for not doing what you wanted.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.