Player topic: Stevan Jovetic (2014/15)

[mosssideblue]

I think you clearly have no understanding !!!

read his quotes.. he thinks he has contributed more than enough so you're talking nonsense pal.

He is shite and not good enough for a top premier league team. He might do ok in another country and i wish him well.

I will leave you with your immatute thoughts then.

Stop trying to make out you're some sort of intellect, your spelling is a joke and you clearly know absolutely nothing about football. I've probably forgotten more than you know..... Run along now

Notwistanding my spelling mistake, not sure how you can deduce those comments from my post. Perhaps if you put your energy into supporting rather than slagging, you may well be better received. As for him being shite and not good enough, my views towards that have not changed, nor will they because a few on here think they have some better understanding, when clearly they are talking out of the wrong orifice. :)

 

[PragueBlue]

The main reason Jovetic was omitted was not his playing quality (which has been good enough to merit at least a place on the bench), but his glass physique. With Aguero already fragile, we cant afford another hospital ward regular.

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

 

[sam-caddick]

The main reason Jovetic was omitted was not his playing quality (which has been good enough to merit at least a place on the bench), but his glass physique. With Aguero already fragile, we cant afford another hospital ward regular.

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

 

[aguero93:20]

The main reason Jovetic was omitted was not his playing quality (which has been good enough to merit at least a place on the bench), but his glass physique. With Aguero already fragile, we cant afford another hospital ward regular.

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

Not keen on Dybala, both Kun and Bony are better versions of him so he's not going to see any game time if we get him, I'd much rather we went balls out for Lacazette, who's proved himself in a far more testing league for a striker.

 

[sam-caddick]

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

Not keen on Dybala, both Kun and Bony are better versions of him so he's not going to see any game time if we get him, I'd much rather we went balls out for Lacazette, who's proved himself in a far more testing league for a striker.

Lacazette was nowhere near as good at 21 than Dybala is, plus Dybala is more of a link up striker and can assist as much as score which we need when replacing Jovetic.

I like Lacazette but having three out and out striker in him, Sergio and Bony would be too much, I think we need that more complete forward.

I personally think Dybala is on his way to potentially being the new Suarez, he is very similar in my opinion.

 

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

The main reason Jovetic was omitted was not his playing quality (which has been good enough to merit at least a place on the bench), but his glass physique. With Aguero already fragile, we cant afford another hospital ward regular.

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

I think we are more likely to end up getting nothing, loaning him out and paying half his wages for the next year. Our sales record is not the greatest.

 

[Davs 19]

He's always been fragile though so perhaps we should be asking questions of who made the decision to sign him.

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

I think we are more likely to end up getting nothing, loaning him out and paying half his wages for the next year. Our sales record is not the greatest.

We're improving though........I give you Rodwell, Johnson and Negrado .:)

 

[bluechampion7891]

His injury record was always going to be the big concern at City, but we needed a secondary option to Isco after missing out on him and Jovetic looked one if the best alternatives at the time.

I think there will be a number of takers in the summer so I am hoping we can recoup back the £22m we paid for him and send that money Palermo's way and get Dybala in.

Not keen on Dybala, both Kun and Bony are better versions of him so he's not going to see any game time if we get him, I'd much rather we went balls out for Lacazette, who's proved himself in a far more testing league for a striker.

Lacazette was nowhere near as good at 21 than Dybala is, plus Dybala is more of a link up striker and can assist as much as score which we need when replacing Jovetic.

I like Lacazette but having three out and out striker in him, Sergio and Bony would be too much, I think we need that more complete forward.

I personally think Dybala is on his way to potentially being the new Suarez, he is very similar in my opinion.

i dont like that argument. thats like saying Yaya was nowhere near as good as Pogba at 21.

however, I generally agree with the rest. But one thing that we might want to make sure is that the player we get can lead the line on his own as well as play as link up striker. in a 442 IMO the former is the more important aspect, whereas in a 4231 I would say the latter is more important for 3rd choice striker

 

[BlueTG]

So he says he deserves to be on the list for scoring 5 goals in not so many minutes in the league, and we're in February.

Hahahahaha thats exactly one of the reasons you've been dropped from the list mate.

 

[nikoman]

In an interview last year I remember Manuel's words: 'a player who don't let the manager do his job, must be eradicate from the team'
If Jovetic's statements are true I think we are not going to see him play more than 5 minutes per game.