I get that you like the fella and would like to see his huge fortune further bloated, but if a third keeper only has to be good enough to sit in the stands, rather than good enough to at least offer something to the team if push comes to shove, then why have one at all?
He didn’t have the ability or the inclination to play the kind of football that City play under Pep. He had his chance to show Pep but he failed. He then went on to fail miserably at Birmingham, Torino, West Ham and Burnley and you think that Pep should have another look at him in the hope that he might suddenly be good enough to allow City to play their game with him in net if it ultimately transpired that our 1st & 2nd keepers were simultaneously injured?
Hart is not a name than can be seriously put forward in the ‘players than might improve us’ thread.
