Policing in the UK

How do you know that he didn't go outside of that remit?

Eyewitness accounts say he refused to obey orders to get out of the car and instead he tried to ram police vehicles to get away.

Is that putting officers in danger and worthy of a response?

I’d say it was and he got it.

Just pretend it was a fat bald middle aged Englishman who voted for brexit and has a XL Bully if it helps you get over it.
 
Eyewitness accounts say he refused to obey orders to get out of the car and instead he tried to ram police vehicles to get away.

Is that putting officers in danger and worthy of a response?

I’d say it was and he got it.

Just pretend it was a fat bald middle aged Englishman who voted for brexit and has a XL Bully if it helps you get over it.

Didn't know you owned an XL Bully.
 
More of a smooth haired miniature dachshund man myself.

I had a red one growing up. He hated walking over wet mud and I always used to pick him up to protect him from other dogs.

I'm guessing you wouldn't actually let your dogs play with bullies and are just being reactionary to an obvious OTT satirical post in an another thread just for the sake of it.
 
I had a red one growing up. He hated walking over wet mud and I always used to pick him up to protect him from other dogs.

I'm guessing you wouldn't actually let your dogs play with bullies and are just being reactionary to an obvious OTT satirical post in an another thread just for the sake of it.

They don’t like the rain that’s for sure.

Love a bit of satire I do ;-)
 
We wouldn’t need them if folk didn’t demand armed officers where prosecuted on the very rare occasion they shoot dead dangerous criminals whilst following their own rules and training and risking their own lives.

How do you know that he didn't go outside of that remit?

We don't. Anyone who says they do is full of shit.

At present there's zero evidence avaialable to the public so any rational person would be letting the judicial process take place without assuming the firearms officer was right to shoot him or not.
 
We don't. Anyone who says they do is full of shit.

At present there's zero evidence avaialable to the public so any rational person would be letting the judicial process take place without assuming the firearms officer was right to shoot him or not.

Here comes the forums Oracle…
 
We wouldn’t need them if folk didn’t demand armed officers where prosecuted on the very rare occasion they shoot dead dangerous criminals whilst following their own rules and training and risking their own lives.
It's another Tory distraction. They are interfering with an ongoing legal case to say our police cannot do their job and blame the EHRC for it.
 
Eyewitness accounts say he refused to obey orders to get out of the car and instead he tried to ram police vehicles to get away.

Is that putting officers in danger and worthy of a response?

I’d say it was and he got it.

Just pretend it was a fat bald middle aged Englishman who voted for brexit and has a XL Bully if it helps you get over it.

Eyewitness accounts say Russell Brand is a rapist but I think you were favouring an innocent until proven guilty approach on that one rather than a straight up extra judicial killing?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.