Political relations between UK-EU

It is a race, though. Not between individual countries or blocs as in the case of the EU but against Covid. Once again she criticises the UK approach rather than concentrating on their own.

It is also a fact that the AZ vaccine has been so successfully undermined in the EU generally that people are turning it down. I can’t see it being used to any great extent there as people will be demanding Pfizer, Moderna or others maybe as they are approved as they regard AZ as second best.
Have you read the interview? Unless I missed something the only thing she said which could be construed as a criticism of the UK approach is:

"I think it's risky to simply postpone the second vaccination. We should stick to the specifications that the manufacturers have determined in their extensive clinical tests. We are therefore not extending the second vaccination." (Google translate version).

There's an implied criticism of the UK within that, for sure, but it's a legitimate view to hold. I'm not saying it's my opinion, just that it's not a mad idea that you'd stick to manufacturer's specifications about timing of the two doses.

However I completely agree with your second point about the way the AZ vaccine has been undermined in the EU. Stupid, reckless stuff - although probably individual European politicians like Macron are more to blame for this than the EU per se.
 
I didn’t realise that you decided what is suitable for this thread or not.

I stand by my comments but feel free not to agree with them..

Edit: further evidence of the inevitable outcome of the EUs attempt to discredit AZ on the Guardian live blog


I'm not a mod so you can post whatever you want wherever you want as far as I'm concerned, but what you've posted is sod all to do with UK-EU relations. The Covid thread is over there --->
 
I'm not a mod so you can post whatever you want wherever you want as far as I'm concerned, but what you've posted is sod all to do with UK-EU relations. The Covid thread is over there --->

Except it is absolutely to do with UK/EU relations though. The deliberate campaign to undermine both the efficacy of AZ and the UK government’s decision to have a longer gap between doses was a result of Brexit and the fact that the EU for internal reasons doesn’t want the UK to be seen to be doing better than they are.

Macron has his presidential election to contend with so he went even stronger against AZ and the outcome is that it has totally backfired and more or less no-one in the rest of Europe wants to be ‘fobbed off’ with AZ. If the UK was still in the EU & the second largest net contributor then you would have seen an entirely different approach.
 
Last edited:
Except it is absolutely to do with UK/EU relations though. The deliberate campaign to undermine both the efficacy of AZ and the UK government’s decision to have a longer gap between doses was a result of Brexit and the fact that the EU for internal reasons doesn’t want the UK to be seen to be doing better than they are.

Macron has his presidential election to contend with so he went even stronger against AZ and the outcome is that it has totally backfired and more or less no-one in the rest of Europe wants to be ‘fobbed off’ with AZ. If the UK was still in the EU & the second largest net contributor then you would have seen an entirely different approach.

Why was that a result of brexit? Everything that has happened with the vaccine rollout could have happened with us in or out of the EU.

On the second doses in particular, there’s nothing wrong with them saying why they’re not taking a similar approach to us and the reasons why. There’s no way of doing that without perceived criticism of the other approach though.

They’ve gone hard against AZ because the EU made themselves look stupid over the allocation of the initial doses and their reaction to it. AZ isn’t the U.K. though.
 
Except it is absolutely to do with UK/EU relations though. The deliberate campaign to undermine both the efficacy of AZ and the UK government’s decision to have a longer gap between doses was a result of Brexit and the fact that the EU for internal reasons doesn’t want the UK to be seen to be doing better than they are.

Macron has his presidential election to contend with so he went even stronger against AZ and the outcome is that it has totally backfired and more or less no-one in the rest of Europe wants to be ‘fobbed off’ with AZ. If the UK was still in the EU & the second largest net contributor then you would have seen an entirely different approach.
You've convinced me that it is an internal EU issue that does not have any effect on their relations with us, now that their brief invocation of NIP Article 16 last month is history. Whilst all of what you said may well be true, what is it to do with us other than there is no pressure on us to export any of our locally manufactured AZ vaccine to the EU?
 
Except it is absolutely to do with UK/EU relations though. The deliberate campaign to undermine both the efficacy of AZ and the UK government’s decision to have a longer gap between doses was a result of Brexit and the fact that the EU for internal reasons doesn’t want the UK to be seen to be doing better than they are.

Macron has his presidential election to contend with so he went even stronger against AZ and the outcome is that it has totally backfired and more or less no-one in the rest of Europe wants to be ‘fobbed off’ with AZ. If the UK was still in the EU & the second largest net contributor then you would have seen an entirely different approach.

The EU cleared the AZ vaccine for use. Some individual countries, being sovereign and independent, did not give clearance for full use. Switzerland didn’t authorise the AZ vaccine either and that isn’t in the EU.

The US and Japan are conducting their own trials on AZ before granting authorisation.

All countries have their own procedures on these matters.
 
I think the answer is a resounding, ’Yes, this is exactly what we voted for.’

Is this what we voted for? Devastating Brexit poll sheds light on splintering UK trade

 
This direction of travel on this is that banks either repatriate Euro trade to the Eurozone voluntarily, or they will be forced to do so by regulation.

‘Exclusive: Europe’s top banks must justify why they should not have to shift clearing of euro-denominated derivatives worth billions of euros from London to the European Union after Brexit, an EU document seen by Reuter’s shows.’

 
I think the answer is a resounding, ’Yes, this is exactly what we voted for.’

Is this what we voted for? Devastating Brexit poll sheds light on splintering UK trade

The Express is comedy gold these days. The sound of chickens coming home to roost is getting louder and louder.
 
This direction of travel on this is that banks either repatriate Euro trade to the Eurozone voluntarily, or they will be forced to do so by regulation.

‘Exclusive: Europe’s top banks must justify why they should not have to shift clearing of euro-denominated derivatives worth billions of euros from London to the European Union after Brexit, an EU document seen by Reuter’s shows.’

The Euro swaps clearing through London is a technology issue. There was no reason to build a platform outside of London to do it so it was always going to just be done in London. Until brexit gave the EU the reason to force the Banks to build a system. It will take a wile but it will happen.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.