Porto v City Post Match Discussion thread

Re: BBC Stats

alib said:
reading the report of the game on the BBC Sport website and accoring to their stats Porto had 14 shots at goal with 9 on target!!!!

whereas City had just 8 shots with 6 on target!!!

couldn't have been watching the same game as i was?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/match/2012/feb/16/porto-v-manchestercity" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/matc ... hestercity</a>

This says Porto had 14 attempts, but 2 on target.

We had 6 attemps, and all 6 on target.
 
Amazed we ended the game with 11 men last night. As soon as we scored, something just clicked in the ref, and he started booking us for every single foul + non fouls yet allowed alot of thier players to foul without a card. For a brief period, it seemed we were afraid to tackle due to this after picking up many soft cards.
Funny enough, the 1 tackle we made, by Kolorov, which warranted a yellow he didnt book him.

And how Hulk didnt pick up a booking for diving is a mystery. 88 million buyout in his contract. Wouldnt pay 8.8 million.

Commentry on ITV was a disgrace throughout, total contrast to commentry on the Utd game. Chiles i think, despite claiming he is a WBA fan, must be a closet rag. They were dying for Porto to win, you could clearly here it. When we won tackles cleanly they often made out we fouled and got away with it, the lunge on Nasri they made out he left a foot in which he clearly didnt.
One line "champion league dropouts and now 1 goal down here" everything was negative. Even my totally unbiased father who often moans at me and my brother complaining mentioned it.

Chiles "Utd win at Ajax but can City do the same". No Chiles, we were playing a good team. Even after the game Reid called Porto a "competant" team FFS. Yep, Holders, CL dropouts and a team who qaulifies for Europe year after year are "competant"<br /><br />-- Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:06 am --<br /><br />
Jumanji said:
alib said:
reading the report of the game on the BBC Sport website and accoring to their stats Porto had 14 shots at goal with 9 on target!!!!

whereas City had just 8 shots with 6 on target!!!

couldn't have been watching the same game as i was?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/match/2012/feb/16/porto-v-manchestercity" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/matc ... hestercity</a>

This says Porto had 14 attempts, but 2 on target.

We had 6 attemps, and all 6 on target.


Same BBC site that still had Everton 1 City 0 in thier headlines weeks after the game and reported a Utd player made his comeback in thier reserve win over City, a game we won 4-2
 
We are favourites to win it at 7/2 with the rags 4/1......Next best is Valencia at 10/1 and potential next round opposition Sporting are 33/1 and 10th favourites.
 
There you go - Reds prophesy that nerves will get the better of city coming true - won at a stadium where the home team just DOESN'T lose! Yeah, right, wotever, Purplenose!
 
SuperKevinHorlock said:
Spare a thought for Stuart Atwell even he is better than that ref from last night.

Anyway a top European performance against a very good team who like to dive and cheat.
Not a chance, he was very good, just went by the book with all the yc, Atwell on the other hand is a fucking bent
 
Complete joke of a ref performance last night but what a top performance from the players.

Really turned it on the 2nd half. Very glad to have Yaya back that's for sure!


How awful were the refs/pundits. "Do you think the players will be told about utd's result" WHY THE FCUK would they care. Do you get 3 points for a win in Europa knockout?? THAT WILL STOP US GETTING THROUGH OUR GAME FFS
 
what a game , got back from porto last night 3am . What a fantastic day all round, porto through the day sunshine , beer , city , flags . support at the stadium top notch even tho a lot of blues were worse for wear after a day on the superbocks !

thought we showed real bottle and class last night
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.