Post counts

[SWP's back]

Are you trying to claim you have a better understanding of policy decisions made on the site than an administrator of the site?

Yes.

 

[BenLlewellyn]

Can the mods still see how many posts someone has made?

 

[2sheikhs]

I must admit that if someone starts slagging off one of our players and only has a handful of posts, I immediately have my suspicions about
them.

 

[Damocles]

Yes.

That's good enough for me and presumably for others to ignore the rest of what you say on this issue.

 

[Damocles]

Can the mods still see how many posts someone has made?

The changes made effect everybody equally

 

[Ric]

Can the mods still see how many posts someone has made?

Everyone can still see how many posts someone has made by clicking on their username.

 

[worsleyweb]

The changes made effect everybody equally

I think the negatives of removing the post count far outway the positives. I am frequently thought of as a c..t but at least I have been one for 5000 posts rather than someone with 50?

Look forward to them coming back.

 

[SWP's back]

If you're after a consensus, you could run a poll?

 

[Ajm1985]

in fact you're right, we should go by 'date of joining' instead - you're obviously a Rag with only joining this summer ;-)

I'll reply in here to the reply in the De Bruyne thread! Haha yeah I knew it was a joke mate! Everyone is a rag when they join though.

I've only just joined so this change has little impact on me. When somone posts incredibly negatively about City, our owners, transfers etc they get called rags or WUMS regardless of post count or longevity, so neither seems that important.

 

[Rascal]

I advocated doing this back in 2006.

Well done.