TGR said:Josh Blue said:It is believed that 50 Civilians Are Killed For Every 1 Terrorist.
Pakistan suffers the most from Drone attacks and the causalities are believed to be as high as 3,299 which includes 197 children.
The list of countries that are subject to regular drone attacks are Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia.
The aim is to kill suspected terrorists with precision drone strikes. If the suspected terrorist is in a school then so be it, collateral damage. However to be suspected of being a terrorist you only have to be a Muslim man of military age.
Obama signs every drone strike off personally.
The mainstream media will rarely mention these tragedies and our cowardly government supports the program. People should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life but nobody seems to care?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWKG6ZmgAX4[/youtube]
Chilling evilness.
Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
TGR said:I assume you mean the innocent people killed by the terrorists?Ragnarok said:Tuearts right boot said:That unfounately is the nature of the beast. Terrorists dont wear uniforms and 'hide' amongst civilians. No easy way either way.
Surely there has to be a better way than killing countless number of innocent civilians. But anyway thats Americas strong point. Their constitution virtually allows them to do anything at all to further their interests without regard for the consequences. Its the main reason they are the most powerful country in the world at the moment
-- Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:46 pm --
TGR said:Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
I assume the tens of hundreds of innocents who die every month should be ashamed of themselves too ....
TGR said:Josh Blue said:It is believed that 50 Civilians Are Killed For Every 1 Terrorist.
Pakistan suffers the most from Drone attacks and the causalities are believed to be as high as 3,299 which includes 197 children.
The list of countries that are subject to regular drone attacks are Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia.
The aim is to kill suspected terrorists with precision drone strikes. If the suspected terrorist is in a school then so be it, collateral damage. However to be suspected of being a terrorist you only have to be a Muslim man of military age.
Obama signs every drone strike off personally.
The mainstream media will rarely mention these tragedies and our cowardly government supports the program. People should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life but nobody seems to care?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWKG6ZmgAX4[/youtube]
Chilling evilness.
Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its not a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
Josh Blue said:pominoz said:Josh Blue said:Peoples mothers, fathers and kids wiped out instantly just because a terrorist is in the area. Horrible stuff.
Edit- remember 7/7, 9/11, Bali, Madrid?
We are fighting a war here and unfortunately there will be civilian casualty's.
Better than carpet bombing of cities as was done in the past.
Are we fighting a war? Who is we?
Are the people of Yemen and Pakistan fighting a war?
Josh Blue said:TGR said:Josh Blue said:It is believed that 50 Civilians Are Killed For Every 1 Terrorist.
Pakistan suffers the most from Drone attacks and the causalities are believed to be as high as 3,299 which includes 197 children.
The list of countries that are subject to regular drone attacks are Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia.
The aim is to kill suspected terrorists with precision drone strikes. If the suspected terrorist is in a school then so be it, collateral damage. However to be suspected of being a terrorist you only have to be a Muslim man of military age.
Obama signs every drone strike off personally.
The mainstream media will rarely mention these tragedies and our cowardly government supports the program. People should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life but nobody seems to care?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWKG6ZmgAX4[/youtube]
Chilling evilness.
Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its not a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
Pakistan were harboring Bin Laden? He was an ex CIA tactian hiding in Pakistan. The U.S didn't need him anymore so stormed in a killed him (if he wasn't dead already).
I am up in arms about an innocent loss of life. A suicide bomber is a terrorist but these drone strikes are also the act of terrorism.
Josh Blue said:Not the source I'm looking for but a quick insight of how easy it is to be a suspected Terrorist in the U.S
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N-WK2KtxHfQ[/youtube]
bonespost said:Are the RAF flying USAF drones still .
TGR said:Josh Blue said:TGR said:Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its not a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
Pakistan were harboring Bin Laden? He was an ex CIA tactian hiding in Pakistan. The U.S didn't need him anymore so stormed in a killed him (if he wasn't dead already).
I am up in arms about an innocent loss of life. A suicide bomber is a terrorist but these drone strikes are also the act of terrorism.
All the proof we needed of who is the 'nutjob'.
Give me strength!
Ragnarok said:What i find pathetic is when on one side innocents are killed, its terrorism ( and it is ) but on the other side of the coin its seems to be perfectly acceptable. Pathetic. I thought terrorism broadly means killing of innocent people in a act of aggression against a particular country. If that doesnt define what the US and EU are doing to Afghanistan,Pakistan,yemen etc i dont know what does.
pominoz said:Ragnarok said:What i find pathetic is when on one side innocents are killed, its terrorism ( and it is ) but on the other side of the coin its seems to be perfectly acceptable. Pathetic. I thought terrorism broadly means killing of innocent people in a act of aggression against a particular country. If that doesnt define what the US and EU are doing to Afghanistan,Pakistan,yemen etc i dont know what does.
What would be your reaction to state sponcered/supported terrorism?
Invite them around to tea and cakes, and have a chat about it?
pominoz said:Ragnarok said:What i find pathetic is when on one side innocents are killed, its terrorism ( and it is ) but on the other side of the coin its seems to be perfectly acceptable. Pathetic. I thought terrorism broadly means killing of innocent people in a act of aggression against a particular country. If that doesnt define what the US and EU are doing to Afghanistan,Pakistan,yemen etc i dont know what does.
What would be your reaction to state sponcered/supported terrorism?
Invite them around to tea and cakes, and have a chat about it?
Josh Blue said:pominoz said:Ragnarok said:What i find pathetic is when on one side innocents are killed, its terrorism ( and it is ) but on the other side of the coin its seems to be perfectly acceptable. Pathetic. I thought terrorism broadly means killing of innocent people in a act of aggression against a particular country. If that doesnt define what the US and EU are doing to Afghanistan,Pakistan,yemen etc i dont know what does.
What would be your reaction to state sponcered/supported terrorism?
Invite them around to tea and cakes, and have a chat about it?
You do realise the U.S has a very long history of sponsoring terrorism? Lately it had been Libya and Syria.
pominoz said:Josh Blue said:pominoz said:What would be your reaction to state sponcered/supported terrorism?
Invite them around to tea and cakes, and have a chat about it?
You do realise the U.S has a very long history of sponsoring terrorism? Lately it had been Libya and Syria.
Yes i do, but i do not see the helping to overthrow murderous dictators as an act of terrorism.
TGR said:Josh Blue said:TGR said:Hysterical post.
Drones dramatically reduce the risk of soldiers being killed whilst on special missions.
They would not knowingly strike a school full of children.
Pakistan gets hit often as they harbour terrorists (including Bin Laden)
Why does Obama sign of every strike personally? Because he takes such things extremely seriously (and I 'aint no Obama fan!)
Maybe we should be up in arms about the tragic loss of human life caused by these terrorists - or would make people be 'bigots' 'racisits, 'right wingers' etc?
Your post is complete and total nonsense. if you have posted it seriously and its not a wum you should ashamed of yourself.
Pakistan were harboring Bin Laden? He was an ex CIA tactian hiding in Pakistan. The U.S didn't need him anymore so stormed in a killed him (if he wasn't dead already).
I am up in arms about an innocent loss of life. A suicide bomber is a terrorist but these drone strikes are also the act of terrorism.
All the proof we needed of who is the 'nutjob'.
Give me strength!
pominoz said:Josh Blue said:pominoz said:What would be your reaction to state sponcered/supported terrorism?
Invite them around to tea and cakes, and have a chat about it?
You do realise the U.S has a very long history of sponsoring terrorism? Lately it had been Libya and Syria.
Yes i do, but i do not see the helping to overthrow murderous dictators as an act of terrorism.