halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,942
But again thats just human....different perspective at a different time. Saying you can guarantee that it will happen differently in another game is just like saying you can guarantee that the Sun will come up or that tomorrow will be Sunday...
Maybe he changes his decision next time cause he realises he got it wrong?
The problem is everyone - players/managers/fans are out for themselves - until there is genuine integrity amongst these different groups we will continue to have these discussions. Its rare (very) that a manager comes out and says...yes that decision that went for us was wrong....they at the very least come out with something ambiguous or relate it to a previous decision where something went against them (as if that justifies it! - in reality its a very childish reaction)
You can understand the referee making a snap decision in the half second he has available to him, and making different decisions in the same circumstances in different matches based on what he saw / could see. But surely it's not beyond the competence of VAR to ensure some consistency?
This thing where VAR doesn't get involved unless there is an absolute howler on some things, but then gets involved for 1mm on others isn't doing itself any favours, IMO.
I don't have a problem staying with on-field decisions, quite honestly, but then do it for all decisions.