Would that apply in a case of violent conduct? If it did, that'd mean you could make a punchbag out of someone in the penalty area and because a penalty has been awarded, you wouldn't get sent off. I'm not fully up to speed on the new rule, but I doubt you'd get away with that somehow.Double Jeopardy rule.
Mason should have at least give him a yellow.
And he's not a City player so won't get the 4 match ban.But they'll still be able to field 11 players.
I agree.
It's the only justification for not doing him I can think of? Apart from Mason being a corrupt ****.
NBC calling for a ban. Are BT/SKY calling it "A controversial penalty"?
It's the only thing I can think off for not carding him. Apart from kicking off on the agenda thread.Would that apply in a case of violent conduct? If it did, that'd mean you could make a punchbag out of someone in the penalty area and because a penalty has been awarded, you wouldn't get sent off. I'm not fully up to speed on the new rule, but I doubt you'd get away with that somehow.
The commentator said it was worth a retrospective review. The washed up pundit with him (Tony Gale??) ignored it.My commentators haven't mentioned any potential review.
Double jeopardy rule not in force for serious foul play of which an elbow isDouble Jeopardy rule.
Mason should have at least give him a yellow.
A defence????Bellerin shows exactly what we're missing.