Premier League Games 21/22/23 January '22

That was two players colliding. Why was one of them to blame? If Jota hadn't miskicked the ball in the first place, they would have still collided, but the ball would probably have been there too. If it resulted in a save, would a penalty have been awarded for the collision? Probably not.

When the referee is asked to consult the monitor, he invariably backs up the VAR with the decision.

Why couldn't this have been an innocent collision with no-one at fault?
 
The point is, there were 2 marginal decisions yesterday (Kev's pen and the red card for the foul on Laporte) and 2 marginal decisions today (Offside for their second goal and the pen). 4 out of 4 of those marginals went against City. That is a pattern, and it's obvious to anyone who wants to look.

Plus our referee never once was asked to look at the monitor why? Because they was a rag kunt in var
 
NBC very happy with the result -Title race is alive, viewers will continue watching. There was real danger of losing big money with title race appearing to be over so soon.
Well the game is all about money so anything that may effect revenue is frowned upon. Our owners probably wouldn't have invested in the PL if not for the lure of big money.
Neutrals don't want to see a procession like the last two seasons they want a contest. Add to that the fact that most people don't like us anymore means many would love to see us hauled back and overtaken. We have to make sure that does not happen by keeping up the pressure.
 
What can you say about VAR and the way it's being used ? Do we need a panel of 3 instead of just one telling the ref to look at the monitor ?
Good discussion on Bein sports right now with Gray, De Jong and Keys. Why aren't we allowed to hear the discussions when the ref is told to view the monitor and while it's being looked at ? Why are the officials allowed to hide this wall of silence and why are the fans in the ground being ignored when they have no knowledge of what's going on.
The current situation cannot be allowed to continue.
 
That was two players colliding. Why was one of them to blame? If Jota hadn't miskicked the ball in the first place, they would have still collided, but the ball would probably have been there too. If it resulted in a save, would a penalty have been awarded for the collision? Probably not.

When the referee is asked to consult the monitor, he invariably backs up the VAR with the decision.

Why couldn't this have been an innocent collision with no-one at fault?
Jota stepped into the keeper for me. Correct decision would be palace free kick
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.