Premier League Games 23/24/25 August

[SebastianBlue]

Repetitive. ;)

Repetitive. ;-)

 

[simon23]

I don’t think that’s right. Today there have been four goals, all reviewed by VAR with no delay to the game at all.

At least two of our goals this season have taken a couple of minutes to delay. If they can do a review in a few seconds why do ours take so long ? It has nothing to do with the broadcaster. They’re not doing the review.

depends on the borderline nature of the the VAR enquiry....if its clearly onside/offside, it wont take long to review

You misunderstood my post as it was a reply to someone else....they were talking about why wasnt the reviewed shown to the TV audience - I said it is that that is probably upto the broadcaster whether the review is shown or not.....

of course its upto no one whether the goals are reviewed or not as ALL goals are automaticaly reviewed - lets say someone sticks in a 35 yd screamer - that will be reviewed but will probably take seconds as there is little to review...

This is why we (City) will get more reviews...we attack more, and the way we attack (nd subsequently tems defend (on the 18yd line) will mena more cahnes to catch us offside, more reviews and more borderline decisions.

 

[Machiavelli]

Repetitive. ;-)

Purple.

 

[simon23]

The issues with the current implementation are not just confined to how it impacts outcomes (and there are issues there, as described by many already), they also extend to transparency and fan adoption.

so you are saying that the officials doing the reviews are going to be affected by what the broadcaster shows back to the TV audience (or doesnt show them?) - that makes no sense.

 

[kaz7]

depends on the borderline nature of the the VAR enquiry....if its clearly onside/offside, it wont take long to review

You misunderstood my post as it was a reply to someone else....they were talking about why wasnt the reviewed shown to the TV audience - I said it is that that is probably upto the broadcaster whether the review is shown or not.....

of course its upto no one whether the goals are reviewed or not as ALL goals are automaticaly reviewed - lets say someone sticks in a 35 yd screamer - that will be reviewed but will probably take seconds as there is little to review...

This is why we (City) will get more reviews...we attack more, and the way we attack (nd subsequently tems defend (on the 18yd line) will mena more cahnes to catch us offside, more reviews and more borderline decisions.

It's nothing to do with the broadcaster if a review is shown,one of the offsides was every bit as close as raz but all we got was a couple of secs view of it with the lines

 

[SebastianBlue]

so you are saying that the officials doing the reviews are going to be affected by what the broadcaster shows back to the TV audience (or doesnt show them?) - that makes no sense.

...not sure how you got that out of my post about transparency and fan adoption.

 

[simon23]

It's nothing to do with the broadcaster if a review is shown,one of the offsides was every bit as close as raz but all we got was a couple of secs view of it with the lines

So you are saying the VAR officals decide whether the review is shown to the live TV audiences (or not)?

 

[kaz7]

So you are saying the VAR officals decide whether the review is shown to the live TV audiences (or not)?

If it is like ours that they pour over it's shown,if there is nothing to see on var review it is not shown,it's nothing to do with the broadcasters,if the game is stopped or they rule out a goal they have to put it on the big screen

 

[SebastianBlue]

Purple.

Have we started a one-word post series story based on (the) Prince’s life?

 

[blue moony]

So you are saying the VAR officals decide whether the review is shown to the live TV audiences (or not)?

Take it to the VAR thread , I don’t want to log in here to see what’s going on in the league today and put up with your bollox take on VAR!

Take it there if F off


Thanks :-)