Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,365
Maybe, but it’s not helpful, is it?He was saying what the rule was last year wasn’t he rather than what it is now?
Maybe, but it’s not helpful, is it?He was saying what the rule was last year wasn’t he rather than what it is now?
I find it maddening that these clowns and so called experts can’t even be arsed to read the basic rules.This is why I mentioned the commentator chatting nonsense. This take is wrong. An accidental handball in the run up to the goal, not made by the scorer, will not effect the outcome of the goal and it would be allowed.
Game, set and match......
Maybe, but it’s not helpful, is it?
He’s allowed ten a game, twenty against City.Joelinton again...snidey forearm to the head.
By the LOTG, Llorente’s was not handball.
It hit his arm and then his thigh and went in. It didn’t go straight in the net off the arm.
Even though the ref said some weird stuff about it afterwards, it was legitimately a goal.
My understanding of the law is that if the ball goes in off the scorers arm (intentional or not), the goal is disallowed. Not a team mate's arm, if it's deemed not to be intentional. Which it clearly wasn't, in today's case.By the LOTG, Llorente’s was not handball.
It hit his arm and then his thigh and went in. It didn’t go straight in the net off the arm.
Even though the ref said some weird stuff about it afterwards, it was legitimately a goal.
Believe thats correct, give it about 20 minutes though and it will probably have changed againMy understanding of the law is that if the ball goes in off the scorers arm (intentional or not), the goal is disallowed. Not a team mate's arm, if it's deemed not to be intentional. Which it clearly wasn't, in today's case.