Premier League Games | 9/10/11/13 May '26

[paulchapo]

Yep, in the first seven days of January we dropped 6 points from three games we should have won. Those games and a few others (Spurs at home, Everton away) means weve gone from home and dry to probably coming up short.

Just the three drawn home games extra points would now have us top by one point with a game in hand. Its infuriating looking back.

 

[Ban-jani]

And that’s why I didn’t watch it.
Obvious they’d win.
Only ourselves to blame.
We’ve let them off the hook about 5 times this season.
I’m still not convinced we win all our remaining games anyway.
Today’s arsenal result hasn’t cost us.
We’ve shit the bed too many times this season and strolled out for far too many second halves.
Our mentality has been piss poor this season.

We’re still in our rebuild, we’re challenging for trophies early. It’s taken Arteta 7 years to build to this and they’re crap.

 

[paulchapo]

Ex keeper agrees, not a foul.

 

[hilts]

According to VAR protocol laid out by IFAB they aren’t allowed any external external contact with the outside world

The plot thickens

 

[york away to this!]

Raya's reaction bought that. Lightweight ****

 

[Pingu the Penguin]

Just the three drawn home games extra points would now have us top by one point with a game in hand. Its infuriating looking back.

Yeah it’s annoying. But it’s what happens over 38 games. We can get better tho which is good

 

[hertsblue]

isn't he doing the cup final?

Yep. Shouldnt be allowed anywhere near our games after that Forest one

 

[dadnlad]

Donnarumma wants to know why he hasn't had a free kick this season for a foul at a corner.

retrospectively booked

 

[ysmsa]

Congratulations all those Blues on here saying it's done, it's over, we lost it here there and everywhere, etc etc.

Hope you are happy with your "I told you so" attitude.

Meanwhile, proper Blues are fucking gutted with that VAR bollocks but still believe.

All to play for in my book, if we win all our games and it's not enough so be it.

 

[Gordyola]

It's been proven that they can hear Stockley Park , so it's not that big a stretch that Stockley park can hear the game commentary.

Yes the media can hear the VAR deliberation it’s allowed VAR aren’t allowed contact with the outside world

• Only authorised persons are allowed to enter the VOR or communicate with the VAR/AVAR/RO during the match

Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol | IFAB

www.theifab.com

 

[Groke]

Would City get that goal crossed off ??

Would we fuck - there would be gallons of jizz in the commentary and VAR boxes

 

[BringBackSwales]

It can't be - the first "offence" is the foul on raya so the penalty becomes irrelevant (stupid as it is)

Rice was doing the holding before the alleged foul on the keeper, wasn’t he?

 

[coolcity]

And the rest!! Fucking ridiculous that a so called unbiased commentator is so wound up that seeing both sides of the story is beyond him.
What bothers me is the amount of gullible cunts that believe and hang on every word of his narrative, you'll do well to find someone that not a blue tomorrow that didn't think it was a foul

The other thing was that must have been replayed by Var, then by the ref, about 30 times before a decision was reached. How much proof do you need that they were looking for a reason to disallow it?

 

[thyer64]

Its true that West Ham player has arm in front of Raya, but the same player being held down by both Gabriel and Trossard so impeding his ability to challenge for the ball, i.e. a pen surely?

Guess not for the corrupt VAR

 

[paulsimpson]

The plot thickens

But yet apparently commentators / pundits can hear what Stockley Park is saying?

 

[Sofiablu]

Great that Sky have got Ian Wright clearing up the disallowed goal with his impartial opinion

 

[skillman]

Just seen that the player who ‘fouled’ Raya is being held by Trossard who isn’t even looking at the ball. Just gets better and better.

 

[urban genie]

Darren England bottled VAR as always, clear fouls on Pablo, if anything it is a penalty

 

[coolcity]

Rice was doing the holding before the alleged foul on the keeper, wasn’t he?

Absolutely he was. Carragher has just said on Sky that there "must have been about 10 fouls in there", clearly the first one wasn't the one on Raya.

 

[hilts]

The decision wasn’t correct. Ratty was narrating the VAR room
Conversation. They noted the rice foul but said the goalkeeper incident came first. It didn’t. That should have been a penalty.

There was all sorts going on, the nonsense at corners has been going on for ever and a day. I suppose they have to judge what affects play, the keeper was fouled and affected, arm and shirt pull.