The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,781
- Team supported
- City
Have the none Biden supporters been galvanised by his actions and decided it’s time to strike?
I tend to agree with your climate change approach.From recollection your view of me was I was a wum, if you see my post just before this you will see why I'm not if you choose to believe me. So I'm in a pretty strange position where if you agree with me i am not wumming or i am but not wumming your point of view or I'm just pissed.
It's a no win situation for me. I actually judge myself for even attempting to explain it because tomorrow normal service will be resumed.
I have a very strong moral code that some don't get. I personally find people extremely illogical in the politics forum. They will happily change their moral outlook so it fits in with their side.
This is not aimed at you but I know exactly how most will post before they actually do. Not because of their morality but because of what group they affiliate themselves to. Its why humans manage to be giant fuck ups and cause people harm.
I do like whisky mind so you have me on that one:-)
A most important point that a lot of people are skirting around.I tend to agree with your climate change approach.
You yourself have called yourself a wum, so it’s probably part of the reason that I take your political posts with a pinch of salt.
I’m not in any group that I know of. Maybe I agree with some people that you disagree with and have plonked me in that group?
What do you think Biden could have done better, given that we don’t know all the security service info and deadlines imposed on him from a previous President?
Like I said I wasn't speaking about you it's mainly the brexit thread guys and those to the left politicall who are very narrow minded in their posting. I think I put that if I was Biden I would have delayed and got people out. It may have taken a bluff with the Taliban and even a threat.I tend to agree with your climate change approach.
You yourself have called yourself a wum, so it’s probably part of the reason that I take your political posts with a pinch of salt.
I’m not in any group that I know of. Maybe I agree with some people that you disagree with and have plonked me in that group?
What do you think Biden could have done better, given that we don’t know all the security service info and deadlines imposed on him from a previous President?
Fair enough Mr Hilts. Maybe I have taken some of your posts in a way they weren’t intended, but I may still be cynical of your motives from time to time. ;-)Like I said I wasn't speaking about you it's mainly the brexit thread guys and those to the left politicall who are very narrow minded in their posting. I think I put that if I was Biden I would have delayed and got people out. It may have taken a bluff with the Taliban and even a threat.
But I don't believe he thought through the consequences of his actions. The end goal affected his judgement IMHO.
People may disagree and I'm fine with that but if posters immediately start insinuating I'm a trump guy or use his fuckwittery as an excuse for anything Biden does I'm going to comment. I never knew being concerned about people's deaths would cause such a nonsense on a football forum.
Everybody on here can be a wum from time to time after you bang your head against the wall over and over again with a poster. Or if they come out with something so utterly bizarre then sarcasm is hardly a huge sin.
However a proper wum is someone who will take any stance just to wind someone up. I don't do that I just agitate those who I think are being dicks. A genuine wum is easy to spot because they change their views on a daily basis.
I have been very consistent on brexit, climate change, trump, corbyn, Johnson pep and our owners. A wum by nature can't be consistent on anything. Their is also a few posters(not many) that I actively dislike because I think they are awful human beings. I ain't getting banned because of them so I just remind them from time to time.
And that is about as fair as we can hope for.Fair enough Mr Hilts. Maybe I have taken some of your posts in a way they weren’t intended, but I may still be cynical of your motives from time to time. ;-)
It is, of course, for a variety of reasons, but what I really enjoyed about it was the story of the reporting, as I did The Post. It’s one of the reasons I detest the generalizations made in many of these threads about the media, especially the “MSM”, which so many prattle on about but don’t know fucking dick about. Since I worked in media once, and I work with the MSM regularly now, I think I have a better appreciation for what the jobs in the industry entail and especially how editors operate, which both films are excellent in portraying.Which is your favourite Watergate movie, and why is it All the president's Men? ;-)
Also, have you listened to the 'Bag Man' podcast?
I never thought you were a Trump guy. I thought you were a both sides suck guy, because you said — effectively — American foreign policy is always about harming brown people.My opinion is he should resign. You don't agree. My explanation was also in there. I'm starting to think you didn't comprehend or read a straightforward post.
The rest is your nonsense not mine.
Anyhow you won't admit you were wrong about me being a Trump guy. Its beyond you emotionally I get it. Let's just move on.
Why should he resign because of that? That’s simply not an explanation. It’s an EXTRAORDINARY step.On the grounds the withdrawal has been a disaster I think that was obvious.
I do think both sides suck in fairness I think American politics is too right wing for me although I'm a bit of bastard on crime and punishment.I never thought you were a Trump guy. I thought you were a both sides suck guy, because you said — effectively — American foreign policy is always about harming brown people.