Basically Raffensperger or Pence had decided to act differently, then it's likely that Biden wouldn't have been sworn in in Jan 21. You can argue whether the courts would have intervened, but don't forget Trump had put Gorsuch, Kavenaugh and Coney Barret on the Supreme Court (Kavenaugh under a cloud, and Coney Barret rushed through seemingly very under qualified) giving a Republican majority.Don't know why anyone struggles to understand that. Regarding voter fraud, when he is on tape asking a Georgia official to "find" votes, that is not normal democracy. In 2024, if the Trumpers' plans come to fruition they will have officials in post in a number of states who actually will "find" the votes that Trump needs, however many he's lost by, and he will have people in the courts that will uphold those decisions.
I meant courts at state level rather than the SC, however I wouldn't expect the SC to overturn a decision made at state level if the proper process was applied even if the decision was knowingly based on fraudulent activity by officials.Basically Raffensperger or Pence had decided to act differently, then it's likely that Biden wouldn't have been sworn in in Jan 21. You can argue whether the courts would have intervened, but don't forget Trump had put Gorsuch, Kavenaugh and Coney Barret on the Supreme Court (Kavenaugh under a cloud, and Coney Barret rushed through seemingly very under qualified) giving a Republican majority.
I'm going to conclude it was an honest mistake on your part rather than malice. Even though history suggests it is probably the latter.Here's a reminder.
Maybe English isn't your first language or you're a bit thick but the word capacity used in that context means only one thing.
Or maybe you meant what you actually posted.
I think it’s because we don’t see Biden as a threat to democracy.We had such a vibrant thread on Trump. Every action and inaction resulted in pages and pages of responses and discussion.
Similar actions by Biden seem to be going unnoticed. Perhaps it's not being reported in the news?
I'm just at a loss at where all the unbiased interest went.
This is certainly NOT a Left-wing conspiracy theory.Don't know why anyone struggles to understand that. Regarding voter fraud, when he is on tape asking a Georgia official to "find" votes, that is not normal democracy. In 2024, if the Trumpers' plans come to fruition they will have officials in post in a number of states who actually will "find" the votes that Trump needs, however many he's lost by, and he will have people in the courts that will uphold those decisions.
Ah look, he isn't totally run by ideology. Surprised byou didn't just clap up the prior posted commentsI meant courts at state level rather than the SC, however I wouldn't expect the SC to overturn a decision made at state level if the proper process was applied even if the decision was knowingly based on fraudulent activity by officials.
Hmmmm... I'll give you that. But a follow up question, why don't we see Biden as a threat to Democracy?I think it’s because we don’t see Biden as a threat to democracy.
I’m confident that Biden will accept the result of the next election, whether he runs or not.Hmmmm... I'll give you that. But a follow up question, why don't we see Biden as a threat to Democracy?
Is that just a function of how 'We' feel or is it based on what he has said or done?