Press Reports versus Fulham

Apart from when City won the Prem and FAC (so that i could keep the MEN as memorabelia) i've not bought a newspaper since my A-level Politics teacher told me to buy the Telegraph so we could do a piece of coursework on a selected story.

Apart from when City win trophies in the future i will not be buying a newspaper ever again in my life.

There is absolutely no need for anyone to ever buy a newspaper unless they want to keep a hard copy of a story or pictures printed in a particular copy.
 
CTID101 said:
What did you expect?

They were desperate for us to lose or draw. Otherwise their "Crisis City" "Mancini hot under the collar" "Mancini loses dressing room in blast with BIG MONEY PLAYERS IN WAGES ROW" headlines went un used.

i guess they all got tired of running "liverpool in crisis" stories
 
I read the report in The Sunday Times yesterday and even though it was written by that bitter old soak Brian Glanville, he acknowledged that it was a merited victory for us. Having said that, he skirted over the Fulham penalty but it wasn't a bad report in all.

Any reporter implying we didn't deserve to win is being utterly deluded. Granted, we started off slowly but despite me quaffing upwards of a gallon of beer pre-match even I could see that the second half was almost totally one-sided.
 
Deluded or keeping their readers happily deluded?

I'll go with the latter.

I can't see a big chunk of the newspapers readership coming from a younger end of the age demographic, where they are more prone to be open minded having a lifetime of Internet use.

The older readers have had a lifetime of being brainwashed and are deluded more so with their own football club.
The newspapers will continue to please this group of people.

Fuck 'em, they can rot in their armchairs watching countdown whilst reading The Daily Fail about how shit City have been this season, how there's a big crisis because a Doctor left the club... oh and let's all blame it on the Foreigners too.... it's true you know, I read it in the paper.
 
Billy, do you feel better now ? I found this thread languishing on page 2, 24 hours after it was posted. No one had bothered to comment, no one gave you a second thought, no one that is but me. I cared, I posted and now it is on page 3.
Here to help, happy to help that's me.
 
Blue Mist said:
Billy, do you feel better now ? I found this thread languishing on page 2, 24 hours after it was posted. No one had bothered to comment, no one gave you a second thought, no one that is but me. I cared, I posted and now it is on page 3.
Here to help, happy to help that's me.


The Labour Party could use your services...could you breath life into Ed Milliband (despite him being clinically dead)
 
BillyMC said:
Blue Mist said:
Billy, do you feel better now ? I found this thread languishing on page 2, 24 hours after it was posted. No one had bothered to comment, no one gave you a second thought, no one that is but me. I cared, I posted and now it is on page 3.
Here to help, happy to help that's me.


The Labour Party could use your services...could you breath life into Ed Milliband (despite him being clinically dead)

Thats the kind of challenge I like and as I pondered how I would do this I thought the first step is to research Pinocchio, to me they are one and the same so just how did Geppetto bring something so wooden to life ?
Sadly Wikkipedia doesn't reveal how it was done, (magic dust, a fairy ?) but it does offer this interesting insight "Pinocchio is often a term used to describe an individual who is prone to telling lies, fabricating stories and exaggerating or creating tall tales for various reasons" and when you think about it you never see Pinocchio and Ed Milliband in the same room, spooky or what.
 
Why Always Ste said:
Deluded or keeping their readers happily deluded?

I'll go with the latter.

I can't see a big chunk of the newspapers readership coming from a younger end of the age demographic, where they are more prone to be open minded having a lifetime of Internet use.

The older readers have had a lifetime of being brainwashed and are deluded more so with their own football club.
The newspapers will continue to please this group of people.

Fuck 'em, they can rot in their armchairs watching countdown whilst reading The Daily Fail about how shit City have been this season, how there's a big crisis because a Doctor left the club... oh and let's all blame it on the Foreigners too.... it's true you know, I read it in the paper.


A bit of generalisation/stereotyping there Why Always Ste, I am of the older generation and never believe anything I read in the papers or even what I see on TV news. I've been this way for 40 years ever since I attended and gave a speech at a Conference and when I read the report the next day I was convinced I had been somewhere else!! So since then I take everything with a pinch of salt!! Plus I rarely buy a paper which I find keeps my blood pressure on an even keel........... and because the doc said I had to cut out salt!!!!! :-)



So please don't put me in a category.............. I am unique...... as are you!!
 
Journalists ( so called ) are like chimps in a cage flinging their own poo around and at the moment we are the biggest target . Like chimps they'll soon get bored and get back to some serious masturbation.
 
According to Ian Ridley in the Mail on Sunday Zabba is from Uruguay!<br /><br />-- Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:53 pm --<br /><br />According to Ian Ridley in the Mail on Sunday Zabba is from Uruguay!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.