Prestwich_Blue

[Tueartsoverhead kick]

@Prestwich_Blue You're accountancy skills are undeniable but will you get back to your proper job Now

Do you think he can advise me on my pension now this is all over , but do you think his rates would have gone up due to his celebrity City status now lol

 

[BigJoe#1]

Thanks Colin from me and all my sheep friends. You were a great, balanced insight into what was an extremely murky affair!

 

[projectriver]

Erm, was it, and is it what you argued? Not really.

Your input was highly informative and enjoyable though, so you can have that one.

Still buzzing.

cheers. This was a good summary of my view on non coop.

https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/...uly-9-30am-bst.339272/page-3465#post-12731896

Not serious rather than no merit. Clearly at €10m CAS consider it more serious than me. I suspect, as Soriano said, City vehemently disagree they didn’t cooperate

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

This is all a bit unfair. For months now I've been saying uefa are ****s but just because I don't use big words and accountancy bollocks it's project fucking what's-his-face and prestwich fucking blue that get their own thread dedicated to rimming them. Pffft- they are probably the same person (rag).

 

[Coatigan]

cheers. This was a good summary of my view on non coop.

https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/...uly-9-30am-bst.339272/page-3465#post-12731896

Not serious rather than no merit. Clearly at €10m CAS consider it more serious than me. I suspect, as Soriano said, City vehemently disagree they didn’t cooperate

Shades of grey in there, and a few clicks on the back/up arrow for what i'm on about. Irrelevant now, anyway, i did genuinely enjoy those discussions and points you raised.

10m is better than 30 which could have been pushed for as well as the only 'retained' element of the punishment. A touch of saving face for Uefa, imho. They are after all their biggest client.

 

[chaddblue]

cheers. This was a good summary of my view on non coop.

https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/...uly-9-30am-bst.339272/page-3465#post-12731896

Not serious rather than no merit. Clearly at €10m CAS consider it more serious than me. I suspect, as Soriano said, City vehemently disagree they didn’t cooperate

Can we challenge this fine?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Can we challenge this fine?

Possibly. But we'd need ot see the full reasons I suspect. It seems completely wrong to me that we should suffer such a significant fine for not co-operating with an investigation that it appears shouldn't have happened in the first place. If it turns out that all the events we were investigated for were time-barred then we had every right not to co-operate.

 

[chaddblue]

Possibly. But we'd need ot see the full reasons I suspect. It seems completely wrong to me that we should suffer such a significant fine for not co-operating with an investigation that it appears shouldn't have happened in the first place. If it turns out that all the events we were investigated for were time-barred then we had every right not to co-operate.

A mate of mine (Oldham fan) asked me if we've done nothing wrong why the fine. When I explained his response was "Wow... fined £10m when you've done nothing wrong"

Think he has a very good point

 

[projectriver]

Can we challenge this fine?

Realistically no

 

[projectriver]

Possibly. But we'd need ot see the full reasons I suspect. It seems completely wrong to me that we should suffer such a significant fine for not co-operating with an investigation that it appears shouldn't have happened in the first place. If it turns out that all the events we were investigated for were time-barred then we had every right not to co-operate.

we aren’t going be challenging the fine. No chance at all