Priti Vacant has a plan, a deal with migrants plan.

I despair.
We are a nation built on immigration: my family fled the Irish famine and were similarly unwelcome at that time. Our government, aided and abetted by our right-wing press, maintain the focus on immigration, endlessly, forcing prejudiced eyes away from the heart of the matter. Our current government is responsible for consistently lying to the electorate and now uses the pandemic to deliver tax rises for services that it alleges that the nation cannot afford. Meanwhile, one in four major UK companies pay no tax and the referendum was delivered rather than sign up to cross-continental legislation on tax avoidance. Why? Because it is estimated that the British territories, long-standing as the global leaders in facilitating the practice, currently hold £32 trillion of offshore wealth. To say that we cannot afford anything more than the lowest state pension in Europe is a lie; to say that we cannot fund proper social care is a lie; to say that the 159% increase in homelessness under this government is insolvable is a lie; to fail to build a single one of the 200,000 new affordable homes, promised in 2015 for completion by 2020, is a lie; to say that we cannot afford to properly police our nation while violent crime soars is a lie. This government even had a stand at its party conference advertising the Cayman Islands.
All the time that the Daily Mail features a dinghy arriving on our shores, remind yourself that a new £5bn arms deal with Saudi Arabia has just been signed and that Margaret Thatcher funded and weaponised the Mujahideen, giving life to the Taliban that is now forcing people to flee Afghanistan. We are responsible for 16% of global arms sales and then complain that people want to leave their ravaged lands while 5.5m UK nationals are free to live and work aboard, basking in the superiority that still calls them ex-pats while any other country has migrants.
Alton Towers, my arse. This is not a big dipper, it is life and death and the safety of family, and we would all do the same.
 
In Vietnam, approximately 43.0 women per 100,000 births die during labor as of 2017. In United Kingdom, 7.0 women do as of 2017.

In Vietnam, approximately 15.7 children die before they reach the age of one as of 2020. In United Kingdom, on the other hand, 4.1 children do as of 2020.

Vietnam has a GDP per capita of $6,900 as of 2017, while in United Kingdom, the GDP per capita is $44,300 as of 2017.

I suppose money isn't everything - although that is a tricky arguement to make on a Manchester City fan's website.

In Vietnam , with a population of 98,168, 833 there have been 14745 deaths from Covid19 compared to a UK death rate of over 170,000 with a population of 68,226,916 (but hey lets only count for the first 28 days after diagnosis)

In Cuba ... virtually 100% of the population can read... In the UK there are 9 million (15%) that cant (see BBC) and the average reading age in the UK is 9 years of age .(having plummeted since Goves ''education transformation'')


In Cuba ... no one goes hungry .... In the sixth richest country in the world we have over 2000 food banks , and It’s thought that 7.3% of the UK population are in poverty. This translates to 4.6 million people living without enough food on a daily basis. Over 1.5 million experience destitution.



In the UK there have been over 150,000 deaths attributed to sanctions by the DWP.

As far as your GDP goes ... I'll leave you with this



You seem to measure all other countries against the ''measures of success'' adopted by a capitalist state that gives no fucks whatsoever for its people rather than a country that does its best for the welfare and happiness of its people despite its poverty and the sanctions imposed on it by said Capitalist states


The UK was 23rd in 2016 (beaten by Puerto Rico and Costa Rica) ...

We can cherry pick all day
 
Well thank you for such a detailed breakdown of the thing I posted,
Taking apart idiotic opinions is all part of the service.
as regards the question you posed all I can answer is with this:

Have you ever been to Alton Towers? There are some good rides and some rubbish ones.
A long time ago, to study it as part of a project.
On planet earth, Britain is one of the 'good rides' and there are massive queues to get on it/in it & this will only get worse as climate change takes effect.
Massive! In 2015 we took in less asylum seekers per 1000 population than Luxembourg, Cyprus and Malta. All tiny countries compared to the UK. We also took less than Sweden, Austria, Germany, Denmark, Holland , Belgium, Greece, Italy, France and Finland.


If I'm at Alton Towers and I see people jumping the queue, it vexxes me. When I see people crossing the channel that is just jumping the queue too.... it is just not right.
Where is this queue?
Furthermore, despite what people may say, most are economic migrants and not asylum seekers
Proof?
- why not stay in your home country and improve it from within?
The majority do, its the persecuted minorities that leave.
Just running away to somewhere better (leaving the women and children behind) won't work forever.
Until there countries are politically stable what choice do they have. If the west keep trying to impose liberal democracy and capitalism on countries that do not want it, it will carry on.
P.S. As regards: "The only newspaper now that is worth paying for is the venerable Socialist daily, the Morning Star." Name a country where communism has actually worked and don't say Cuba:

China.
Quoting a leading Neo-liberal, Libertarian think tank who are funded by shady Capitalist money, that regularly offers stories to the Daily Mail, pursues causes such as dismantling of the NHS is only going to produce a propaganda piece dismissing socialist healthcare.
 
I was a Telegraph reader for years, it had good sport coverage, I loved the cryptic crossword and the Opinion pieces although not my political leanings were always a good read. Sadly nowadays the paper is just another Daily Mail, specialising in outrage journalism and political division.

It is always good for the further right to have a bogey man, France has played that role on many occasions throughout history. Quelle surprise!

Zut Alors!

There was precedent for sending children up chimneys, so will that be considered perfectly acceptable.

That is a loaded statement, pesky French blackmailers.

Tories, not normal people, as the RW nutjobs do not realise everyone pays tax.

So the Telegraph opposes social care for its readers. Vraiment!

Thats it raise the tensions, exaggerate, that gets the blood boiling. Mr Angry of Purfleet will be seething now.

Treacherously, who are they being treasonous towards.

Hopefully our readers know nothing about French politics, so we can tell some fibs and introduce Barnier's name as another bogeyman. The share of foreign-born population in the EU is lower than in most high-income countries and only 9% of immigrants into the EU are asylum seekers. Facts hey!

13.4% of Lebanon's population is made up of refugees, Germany is the largest in Europe where it is 1.4% and that is because of an historic pledge made after WW2. The EU figure overall is 0.6%

The Asylum seeking numbers from 2019 show France accepted 87.100, the UK 32,000. So suiting them going North is a lie.

All that shows is our immigration services are broken, years of austerity, cuts to manpower.

Estimated by who? Farage?

Lets remind ourselves that the Channel migrants are coming from countries that are war torn and/or suffering the effects of climate change. France may be perfectly safe if you are from the Sahel and speak French, but if you are from a country that has a British colonial history chances are your French is on a par with mine.

Desperate people do desperate things. They aren't coming here for welfare, nobody is that daft, they are coming here because we as a country have a long and proud history of being a fair and judicious nation that is safe and the rule of law is sacrosanct,

Just a thought here, but allow them to apply for asylum and they wouldnt need to get into dinghies.


Trust this government, the writer is on crack

Thats what they really want, the right to remove people, hopefully they will start with the PM, he was born abroad.

A good thing

Correct

Get more bogeymen in the piece.

Get some division in the article , good and bad asylum seekers.

No, its on the hands of the British Government and the Prime Minister. Nobody needed to drown to sate the bloodlust of the nutjob right.

Don't mention the Prime Minister, make it about one of his idiotic cabinet members.

Johnson his in a fridge.

Will you tell us why?

Argy-bargy FFS, its not the Five Nations at Twickers, The French are our allies, jingoistic bollox like that is dangerous.

Thankfully I no longer buy a paper that comes out with unmitigated shit. The only newspaper now that is worth paying for is the venerable Socialist daily, the Morning Star.
Great work Rascal
 
"Ve vas only following orders" is the usual excuse yeah?


Yep. Will be very popular with the Brexit crowd. They like a few dead bodies to brighten up their day.

‘Border force officials should be allowed to drown migrants, says Priti Patel, providing they do so in "good faith" and have "reasonable grounds" to do so’

 
Yep. Will be very popular with the Brexit crowd. They like a few dead bodies to brighten up their day.

‘Border force officials should be allowed to drown migrants, says Priti Patel, providing they do so in "good faith" and have "reasonable grounds" to do so’


The interesting thing is when put before international courts we were only following orders is laughed out of court as a defence - I assume that the Border Force know that and Mr O'Mahoney is prepared for his appearance in the Hague
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.