Bit of a grim world view, that. And I do not believe one word they say about the role of government and what is or isn't good for the economy. If IDS says Osbourne and co are a bunch of ideological zealots who cut welfare spending as a matter of principle, then we need to look at that whole issue again because IDS is not exactly Fidel Castro in these respects. And as for dossers and layabouts, well they're just a fact of life. Their existence isn't any reason to attack the financial welfare of families and the disabled.... unless you're George Rich Boy Osbourne, that is.
They went after families and the disabled, not your so called layabouts and dossers. The mean_spirited fornicators are taking the absolute piss. I hope they come back as hamsters after they die.
It's not a grim view, it's accepting human (or just basic animal) behaviour. We would all like to have as much as possible and we would all like to sacrifice as little as possible to get that. In the political landscape that generally equates to the poor voting for tax and welfare increases and the rich voting for tax and welfare cuts.
I think elements of the Conservative party are a bit nasty, but in the current climate I would prefer that to the prolific happy-spending elements of the Labour party.
They went after the dossers, but many of the dossers were posing as disabled. It was an incredibly difficult thing to cut back on but the spending that Labour introduced wasn't manageable. I think Osbourne went way too far in cutting disabled welfare to give higher rate payers a tax cut though.