bladdered
Well-Known Member
Don't worry folks. The club are looking out for our future generations!
Why are they trying to undermine this? I wonder if they discussed any of ‘their plans’ with their members or other groups?
easy solution to all this col, if you don't like the newer groups just get the osc to survey their 34,000 members and they can have a mandate tooBecause City Matters are in discussions with the club on this and are hopeful of getting further concessions.
And while 1984 have a reasonable mailing list, the other two groups are self-appointed spokespersons for the fans. No one even knows who these Trade Union Blues are.
They think the protests are winning concessions from the club but, having worked closely with the club for 4 years on CM, and Points of Blue before that, they'll do whatever they want.
I think OSC is a force for good but it can’t do the confrontational stuff because it’s basically a volunteer/neighbourhood arm of the club, as is City Matters. Really contentious issues need a body with a degree of independence and a bolshiness that the OSC, which is a committee-structured social club for supporters rather than a union/pressure group, doesn’t have and never has. Personally I’d no more look to the OSC to sort this one then I’d look to the office secretary who organises works dos to represent me in a union dispute, no matter how close to management that secretary might or might not be, it’s a job for someone else. I say that as someone who is in the OSC and took part in the protests and will do again on Friday.Why is it always groups like this that take a stand and not the OSC or City Matters?
Sorry but it’s a SUPPORTERS club so surely its main aim should be to do good for the SUPPORTERS not for the club? At best it does stuff only for the supporters who are in a supporters club, and not for the supporter base as a wholeI think OSC is a force for good but it can’t do the confrontational stuff because it’s basically a volunteer/neighbourhood arm of the club, as is City Matters. Really contentious issues need a body with a degree of independence and a bolshiness that the OSC, which is a committee-structured social club for supporters rather than a union/pressure group, doesn’t have and never has. Personally I’d no more look to the OSC to sort this one then I’d look to the office secretary who organises works dos to represent me in a union dispute, no matter how close to management that secretary might or might not be, it’s a job for someone else. I say that as someone who is in the OSC and took part in the protests and will do again on Friday.
Keep doing what your doing WATS, apart from CM Alex you’re the only ones that represent all the interests of all the supporterseasy solution to all this col, if you don't like the newer groups just get the osc to survey their 34,000 members and they can have a mandate too
we will work around the constraints of cm or osc at times to protect them even if some people cannot actually see that and will work with other groups who can speak freely, no harm in that, there are no egos in our groups, no sitting in the tunnel club or next to the directors from any of our groups just hard work and I would say just because a group is new, it doesn't mean they shouldn't be given a chance, after all, in 1949 the osc were new kids on the block !!!
I see the OSC and city matters as HR and 1894 as the union reps.Sorry but it’s a SUPPORTERS club so surely its main aim should be to do good for the SUPPORTERS not for the club? At best it does stuff only for the supporters who are in a supporters club, and not for the supporter base as a whole
I’m in the OSC, but they don’t represent me. The OSC have never canvassed me for my opinions. The OSC takes decisions without consulting their OSC membership. The OSC Rep for City Matters wasn’t elected by the OSC membership.Because City Matters are in discussions with the club on this and are hopeful of getting further concessions.
And while 1984 have a reasonable mailing list, the other two groups are self-appointed spokespersons for the fans. No one even knows who these Trade Union Blues are.
They think the protests are winning concessions from the club but, having worked closely with the club for 4 years on CM, and Points of Blue before that, they'll do whatever they want.
I think they were taken aback, yes. Sounds daft but I thought Khaldoon looked very pensive at Wembley on Sunday.I’m in the OSC, but they don’t represent me. The OSC have never canvassed me for my opinions. The OSC takes decisions without consulting their OSC membership. The OSC Rep for City Matters wasn’t elected by the OSC membership.
There has to be an outside voice as well as an inside voice for the fans. The demonstration against Leicester clearly had an impact on Mansour, Khaldoon, and the City directors. I’d go as far as saying they were probably shocked and taken aback by the level of support for the protest amongst the fans.
As you know all too well PB, having been a long serving, and a good City Matters Rep, what is discussed between the Club and City Matters is NDA’d, so City fans don’t know what is being discussed, or what’s going on. We do now, only because the OSC, or is it one person, is disappointed with the statement.
we sing about them ourselves bossSo can I not sing about empty seats until 10 minutes in ;) haha it’s a joke!
That statement put out by the OSC only reinforces the perception I’ve had for years, which is that OSC’s are an old boy’s knitting circle with an unwelcoming vibe and ‘we’re alright Jack’ attitude who are only arsed about getting their little perks and ticket allocations for their mates.
Of course they don’t want to rock the boat with the club.
I’m disappointed but not remotely surprised.
If the club thought the rank and file City fan was anything like Kevin Parker then it’s safe to say 1894 have given them a massive fucking shock. It’s years now that 1894 have been organising stuff, working hard, going out on a limb etc and I hate to think how shit the atmosphere would be without them (and if we relied on Kevin fucking Parker lol)I’m in the OSC, but they don’t represent me. The OSC have never canvassed me for my opinions. The OSC takes decisions without consulting their OSC membership. The OSC Rep for City Matters wasn’t elected by the OSC membership.
There has to be an outside voice as well as an inside voice for the fans. The demonstration against Leicester clearly had an impact on Mansour, Khaldoon, and the City directors. I’d go as far as saying they were probably shocked and taken aback by the level of support for the protest amongst the fans.
As you know all too well PB, having been a long serving, and a good City Matters Rep, what is discussed between the Club and City Matters is NDA’d, so City fans don’t know what is being discussed, or what’s going on. We do now, only because the OSC, or is it one person, is disappointed with the statement.
If the club thought the rank and file City fan was anything like Kevin Parker then it’s safe to say 1894 have given them a massive fucking shock. It’s years now that 1894 have been organising stuff, working hard, going out on a limb etc and I hate to think how shit the atmosphere would be without them (and if we relied on Kevin fucking Parker lol)
You’re going to need a bigger banner!1000%.
Print this on a banner.
They almost always do.Because City Matters are in discussions with the club on this and are hopeful of getting further concessions.
And while 1984 have a reasonable mailing list, the other two groups are self-appointed spokespersons for the fans. No one even knows who these Trade Union Blues are.
They think the protests are winning concessions from the club but, having worked closely with the club for 4 years on CM, and Points of Blue before that, they'll do whatever they want.