Who gives a fuck? It certainly won't be City or PSG as we have fucking rich owners pumping money in.Camo Bentley said:SWP's back said:Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for informing me.
My point is that football is better as a whole when the competition on the pitch is close and exciting and meaningful. There must be some fair and reasonable way to maintain the intergrity of the leaguse without clubs going bankrupt, or resorting to racketeering and laundering money. Who will be the next Rangers?
The lowest and poorest clubs must be able to keep touch with the richest top clubs. Obviously it's more complicated with some clubs competing in Europe but football as a whole would be more exciting if more revenue was shared (or some other advantage like players) with clubs lower in the table. They could play better football, matches are closer, more entertaining, and will appeal to a wider audience. Do top clubs really need to hoard nearly two full teams of internationals for squad rotation? Imagine at least two superstars at each and every PL club. That is my hope for the future and it will never happen... !
So, wage caps, squad caps, etc and let the supporters benefit with better prices on tickets and broadcasts and travel.
^^Only theez^^SWP's back said:I would be worried if I was a fan of an ageing team with owners that only take money out though.
SWP's back said:Who gives a fuck? It certainly won't be City or PSG as we have fucking rich owners pumping money in.Camo Bentley said:SWP's back said:Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for informing me.
My point is that football is better as a whole when the competition on the pitch is close and exciting and meaningful. There must be some fair and reasonable way to maintain the intergrity of the leaguse without clubs going bankrupt, or resorting to racketeering and laundering money. Who will be the next Rangers?
The lowest and poorest clubs must be able to keep touch with the richest top clubs. Obviously it's more complicated with some clubs competing in Europe but football as a whole would be more exciting if more revenue was shared (or some other advantage like players) with clubs lower in the table. They could play better football, matches are closer, more entertaining, and will appeal to a wider audience. Do top clubs really need to hoard nearly two full teams of internationals for squad rotation? Imagine at least two superstars at each and every PL club. That is my hope for the future and it will never happen... !
So, wage caps, squad caps, etc and let the supporters benefit with better prices on tickets and broadcasts and travel.
I would be worried if I was a fan of an ageing team with owners that only take money out though.
Camo Bentley said:SWP's back said:Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for informing me.
My point is that football is better as a whole when the competition on the pitch is close and exciting and meaningful. There must be some fair and reasonable way to maintain the intergrity of the leaguse without clubs going bankrupt, or resorting to racketeering and laundering money. Who will be the next Rangers?
The lowest and poorest clubs must be able to keep touch with the richest top clubs. Obviously it's more complicated with some clubs competing in Europe but football as a whole would be more exciting if more revenue was shared (or some other advantage like players) with clubs lower in the table. They could play better football, matches are closer, more entertaining, and will appeal to a wider audience. Do top clubs really need to hoard nearly two full teams of internationals for squad rotation? Imagine at least two superstars at each and every PL club. That is my hope for the future and it will never happen... !
So, wage caps, squad caps, etc and let the supporters benefit with better prices on tickets and broadcasts and travel.
If that's right what SWP has posted some clubs are in the shit & it aint us.Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
It is right mate.bluemanc said:If that's right what SWP has posted some clubs are in the shit & it aint us.Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
Camo Bentley said:city91 said:Well done PSG, IMO there is absolutely nothing wrong with what they have done. They are offering a service to a business who are paying them for it.
This deal is blantantly out of bounds. The "retroactive" component should be the first clue.
It should be easy to establish the market value of sponsorship, within a certain range. We have many years of sponsorship data for all the different leagues and the types of businesses that advertise, including travel/tourism markets.
Fair market value will take into account:
-what does this company pay its other sponsees (travel mags, websites)
-what would similar companies bid for such a deal
-domestic exposure and what other clubs get for similar advertising
-international exposure and what clubs get for comparable deals on average
-television presence around the world
There is not even close to value for money here, PSG have minimal international following, and French football as a whole even less. Qatar Tourism Authority are paying 100 quid for a packet of crisps. And another hundred for a retroactive bag that they didn't even eat.
Camo Bentley said:SWP's back said:Not related parties by european accounting definition so fair or market value doesn't come into it. Check the rules fella.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for informing me.
My point is that football is better as a whole when the competition on the pitch is close and exciting and meaningful. There must be some fair and reasonable way to maintain the intergrity of the leaguse without clubs going bankrupt, or resorting to racketeering and laundering money. Who will be the next Rangers?
The lowest and poorest clubs must be able to keep touch with the richest top clubs. Obviously it's more complicated with some clubs competing in Europe but football as a whole would be more exciting if more revenue was shared (or some other advantage like players) with clubs lower in the table. They could play better football, matches are closer, more entertaining, and will appeal to a wider audience. Do top clubs really need to hoard nearly two full teams of internationals for squad rotation? Imagine at least two superstars at each and every PL club. That is my hope for the future and it will never happen... !
So, wage caps, squad caps, etc and let the supporters benefit with better prices on tickets and broadcasts and travel.