Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
If Sane doesn't start against Palace then he's not starting another game this season.
With 35 pages of asking why Foden didn't start.Imagine if we won 40 page post match thread
Then why are you bleating on he picked the wrong teamGuardiola explained his decision not to play de Bruyne in his post match press conference. He said it was tactical and he wanted to play two holding midfielders.
Is that right?If Sane doesn't start against Palace then he's not starting another game this season.
Possibly, yes.Is that right?
and possibly noPossibly, yes.
Both of the players could as easily get injured in minute one or minute 96.
It seems plenty of people want it both ways.
There were eight minutes between De Bruyne and Sane coming on and the final whistle.
Even then, De Bruyne fired in a very dangerous centre and the only surprise was Lloris actually held it.
Bernardo is struggling, that's the long and short of it.
We've won a league title in less minutes than the introduction of Kev and Leroy.
Too soon for a 2nd leg thread?
https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/2019/april/injury-update-harry-kane-dele-alli/
Kane is out, significant lateral ligament ankle injury, I think we all knew that.
Dele Alli fractured left hand, certainly won't be playing comfortable for a while, not allowed to wear a cast and play, not that you would wear a cast in that area. Any fall in a game would exacerbate the injury though.
He can't wear a soft brace if it really is broken,he'll have to at least have something with metal in it,i wouldn't risk it if i was himnever thought before about not being able to play with wrist in a cast. Guess it depends how severe and if he can get away with a soft brace during a match, but would have to be painful.
The Kane injury, that's a shame, but reckless tackle on his part.
What? an Emergency? Well perhaps needing to score an away goal may turn out to be a necessity come 10 o'clock on Wednesday. Should have put them on the pitch after goal at the latest. Time will tell whether this defeat was a good result or not but to me his decision was based more on fear rather than any priorities he may or may not have.
I certainly wouldn't consider anything I have posted on the subject as abuse. Marvin who is the other poster who thinks Pep cocked up, although maybe expressing it a bit more in depth and passionately I wouldn't consider abuse either.
A lot of people still seem a little pissed with the result,,think of it from a spurs fan point of view, going to the home of the champions who have been banging them in all season with a very narrow advantage and having two key players missing, i bet their are not that many spurs fans who are so confident and a bit of a game plan problem for them,do they take the game to us and try for a goal which will probably put the tie to bed or do they sit back and hope to get a break, i think they will do the later so in reality it just becomes like any other game at home where we have to break them down,no doubt we will do that at some point in the 90 minutes and when we do it will send them into panic mode and we will end up banging a few in,,if i was a betting man their is no way i would be putting any cash on spurs to pull it off
never thought before about not being able to play with wrist in a cast. Guess it depends how severe and if he can get away with a soft brace during a match, but would have to be painful.
The Kane injury, that's a shame, but reckless tackle on his part.
It's always the players who score the goals or who make the mistakes.
You are doing a Pep and over-complicating it. Play your best players in the biggest games. You don't see Ronaldo and Messi on the bench in the big games. Very sad to see de Bruyne and Sane sat on the bench watching City toil. I can't say that we would have won with them, but I am pretty convinced that was far from City's best side.
I think a lot of people get the rotation part and get the thinking behind it. But the all round performance wasn't too clever, especially up front. The missed pen was a bummer but it was poorly taken. I've mentioned it before but the subs should have been on not long after they scored, 88 mins was a bit late imho. I'll be thoroughly cheesed off if we go out because of that tepid 1st leg against this spurs team.I know it was far from City's best side.
The question would be why Pep chose it.
Is it that simple, to just play the strongest side in every game, or do Pep & his staff think that will cause us to run out of steam ?
Some appear to think Pep is just dicking around for the sake of it, I think he is trying to accomplish a close to impossible task by managing his resources.
No other manager in the history of the Premier League would even attempt this.
Sane didn't play against Fulham, Brighton or Spurs. He played against Cardiff.I realise the game was important just as much as you do but out of the 4 games including 3 against Spurs and one against Palace, this was the one where Pep could possibly pick a team without Sane and De Bruyne.
There's no way in the world they could possibly start all four games and this was reflected by his team selection on Tuesday.
Looking after 1st leg across all teams Pep was the only one to go with a defensive approach and we are supposed to be the team with most depth.