What did I say about growing up lad?Lol.
“lol” is the response of a 14 year old
What did I say about growing up lad?Lol.
Which law did she refuse to sign off?Well to begin with the reports were in the Mirror, a newspaper not known for its pro monarchist views.
She literally signs off new laws doesn’t she?
I’m hoping she holds the scraggy **** to account but she’s getting on now and maybe it’s a little too late. I hope Charles will do so tho
What did I say about growing up lad?
“lol” is the response of a 14 year old
I never said she did refuse to sign a law off, I am saying she can.Which law did she refuse to sign off?
You do know that some people on the left are monarchists too? Yeah?
She can’t hold anyone to account as she a ceremonial monarch, 96 and stopping more and more public engagements.
Why don’t you actually take me up on my points rather than writing like a teenager and if you’re right and I’m wrong surely you’d rather actually prove it than writing “lol”?Stop bullshitting then, you are clearly confused and making it up as you go along.
FOC.
Sigh.I never said she did refuse to sign a law off, I am saying she can.
Yes, I do know that, although you’ve contradicted your point earlier where you insinuated monarchists weren’t bothered by climate change. The monarchy and climate change concern spans all sides of the political spectrum.
She will struggle due to her age and again, that’s what I said.
Why the sigh when you’re changing your question every post?Sigh.
She can refuse to sign a law off, but she’s chosen not to so far.
She’s leaving it late in the day to do so.
I reckon she might never do this.
Are there odds on this?
Most monarchists are getting on in life.
Most climate change deniers are also getting on in life.
There may not be a correlation, but I reckon that if you did a Venn diagram, there’d be quite the union.
The monarch is a ceremonial role, and has been for a long time.
I've just come back from the future. The news is historical documents reveal that during the last years of her reign Lizzie treated Johnson the PM the way she was treated by him. By changing her official signature from Elizabeth R to a spunking cock and balls.Sigh.
She can refuse to sign a law off, but she’s chosen not to so far.
She’s leaving it late in the day to do so.
I reckon she might never do this.
Are there odds on this?
Most monarchists are getting on in life.
Most climate change deniers are also getting on in life.
There may not be a correlation, but I reckon that if you did a Venn diagram, there’d be quite the union.
The monarch is a ceremonial role, and has been for a long time.
What can the Queen actually do now? Nothing.Why the sigh when you’re changing your question every post?
I never said she did refuse to sign off a law, now you’re saying she may never - so? She hasn’t seen a law she felt was extreme enough to refuse sign off, obviously.
People’s opinions change as they get older. There’s more revolutionary socialists aged 18 than any other age group but they become more socially conservative the older they get. The 18 year olds who are anti monarchy today will likely be pro monarchy aged 40, it’s the way things tend to go.
It looks ceremonial because of her behaviour. That’s what she deserves a lot of credit for.
Why don’t you actually take me up on my points rather than writing like a teenager and if you’re right and I’m wrong surely you’d rather actually prove it than writing “lol”?
Why the sigh when you’re changing your question every post?
I never said she did refuse to sign off a law, now you’re saying she may never - so? She hasn’t seen a law she felt was extreme enough to refuse sign off, obviously.
People’s opinions change as they get older. There’s more revolutionary socialists aged 18 than any other age group but they become more socially conservative the older they get. The 18 year olds who are anti monarchy today will likely be pro monarchy aged 40, it’s the way things tend to go.
It looks ceremonial because of her behaviour. That’s what she deserves a lot of credit for.