Question Time

When she said “it was a one off” she was actually not just making an excuse for Stanley Johnson, she was lying - or at least spreading false information - because Charlotte Johnson has explicitly said he hit her “many times”.
 
Any man who breaks his wife's nose is filth.
Once or twenty times makes no difference.
Should be put in a sack and drowned in the canal.

Lowest of the fucking low - yet still the Beeb platform him for his mad views - have you seen the one about population control? Reckons UK should have no more than 10 -15m people and that the " black people brown people and yellow people" are allowed to breed too much

 
Lowest of the fucking low - yet still the Beeb platform him for his mad views - have you seen the one about population control? Reckons UK should have no more than 10 -15m people and that the " black people brown people and yellow people" are allowed to breed too much



Imagine being such a pathetic embarrassment of a husband, father and everything else besides self-publicist and still thinking himself a member of the master race.
 
When she said “it was a one off” she was actually not just making an excuse for Stanley Johnson, she was lying - or at least spreading false information - because Charlotte Johnson has explicitly said he hit her “many times”.
Nah. She said his friends agreed he'd done it "but only once" - so even his friends say he beat his wife. For "balance" you have to give both sides of the argument - and both sides admit he beat his wife.

If it came across as her making an excuse, that's unfortunate, but it wasn't false information. I actually took it at the time as her being BBC impartial to someone not able to defend himself, but critical of him, and of friends who would justify his occasional bit of domestic abuse (aka breaking his wife's nose).

I suppose she could have added, "But they would say that, wouldn't they?"

I'd still drop her as presenter for other reasons (including lack of impartiality in a right wing biased programme).
 
When she said “it was a one off” she was actually not just making an excuse for Stanley Johnson, she was lying - or at least spreading false information - because Charlotte Johnson has explicitly said he hit her “many times”.
No change there, Tories will be Tories. The lying twats.
 
Nah. She said his friends agreed he'd done it "but only once" - so even his friends say he beat his wife. For "balance" you have to give both sides of the argument - and both sides admit he beat his wife.

If it came across as her making an excuse, that's unfortunate, but it wasn't false information. I actually took it at the time as her being BBC impartial to someone not able to defend himself, but critical of him, and of friends who would justify his occasional bit of domestic abuse (aka breaking his wife's nose).

I suppose she could have added, "But they would say that, wouldn't they?"

I'd still drop her as presenter for other reasons (including lack of impartiality in a right wing biased programme).

That was how I took it too - S Johnson hasn't admitted it or been tried for it (as far as I know).

There was no denial that it had happened. She stated what was known.
 
I see she has had to step back from her charity work with Refuge, who she has supported for 25 years, because of the social media pile on. She has also clarified that she was obliged to say what she said to provide balance. Her words have been misquoted and twisted.
This social media world is dangerous.
 
I see she has had to step back from her charity work with Refuge, who she has supported for 25 years, because of the social media pile on. She has also clarified that she was obliged to say what she said to provide balance. Her words have been misquoted and twisted.
This social media world is dangerous.
Nothing to do with social media , she should have known better than to be leant on to say what she did , bbc pandering to tories again, sick to death of the fucking bbc
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.