Racist podcast rant - Arsenal fan & 'Comedian' Alan Davies not happy with us

Shaggy said:
This tweet backing up and the fucking idiocy of the author



Positively4thStreet
@Positively4thS
Alan Davies is being called a racist today for complaining about ONE individual member of another race. In that case, everybody who took a dim view of Harold Shipman killing his patients must be an anti-Semite, right?

hmfRgAj.png
Click to expand...
Well at least he accepts that we're owned by Sheik Mansour and not the entire state of Abu Dhabi.
 
After we played Arsenal i though things went our way. And that’s where it end.
I didn’t think Arsenal swept us apart, nor that we were lucky, didn’t deserve the win, nor cheated, nor were we the weaker of two.
But it’s all I am reading or hearing.

And the frustration with Arsenal fans is shocking. Close to racist remarks about our owner or player. There’s true hate towards us. Alan Davies leading the crop if he was to be serious.

But I leave the Arsenal fans and the media with their frustrations towards us. Not worth the attention. As I do leave fans and media that support Liverpool and United bading in their bitter comments.

Simply continue to do well and keep our club in a healthy state. So we can enjoy all the bitter frustration. May it last forever.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
He complains about human rights abuses, presumably related to the treatment of migrant labour, yet seems unaware that Walmart, owned by his wife's family, are often cited as very poor employers, with many employees claiming welfare due to low wages, failure to provide healthcare and refusal to recognise unions.

The Arsenal fans were saying "All we want is consistency" about the two penalty incidents so I don't think it's unreasonable for us to ask for their condemnation of their own owner's own abuses of their labour force.
Click to expand...
That's what I keep hearing; consistency. Two penalty incidents, two correct decisions; that's consistency in my book.
 
threespires said:
It always makes me smile that most fans of the 'istree clubs have so little awareness of their actual club histories. More often than not they are mired in corruption and unsavoury behaviour. Not sure if they are hypocrites, johnny come latelys or just thick as mince.
Click to expand...
Indeed. There’s a bit of a backstory to go with that corrupt 1919 Arsenal promotion…

The season before (which was 1914-15 due to WW1), clubs didn’t know at the time that there was to be no relegation and it would be assumed that the bottom two clubs went down as usual. The three clubs in danger of relegation were Spurs, Chelsea, and United.

On the final day, United played Liverpool and both clubs agreed to fix the match in order to keep United up! United won 2-0.

Yes, those two, that so-called “biggest rivalry in English football” (or, more accurately, known as the made up media rivalry between two clubs who are best mates in the boardroom and use each other to promote themselves to the thick masses of morons who fall for it!) colluding together and helping each other out.

Now, I know Billy Meredith and a few other City players were found guilty of offering bungs to Villa players… but we were punished for that, we actually do know it did happen (unlike the Cartel of know-nowts who know nowt about their true histories!), and we don’t pretend it never happened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Musselburgh Blue said:
So, let me get this entirely clear in my mind in case I'm missing something:

1) Arsenal have a good first half and go in 1-0 up at half time but point to Ederson's tackle on Odegaard and scream penalty when the game was still at 0-0. VAR agreed it's not a clear and obvious error after multiple camera angles indicate Ederson won the ball given the direction it travels after. It COULD have been given, but it's hard to tell whether Ederson clips his foot first - no penalty.

2) Bernardo breaks into the area and Xhaka clearly sticks out his left leg across Bernardo which in itself, could be a given as a penalty. Ref says no. Replays then show he ALSO has a hold of his shirt and pulls him down.VAR see this as a clear error, ref looks again - agrees... penalty awarded.

3) Gabriel is caught on camera wrecking the penalty spot in the hope Mahrez misses on the back of it. Referee correctly books him for vandalism of his teams own pitch. Another Arsenal player ESCAPES a booking when he does the same thing.

4) The ref is then point blank accused of blocking a running lane for Martinelli who blazes the ball over the bar when presented with an open goal. People are reaching here, tin foil hat stuff this...

5) Gabriel gets done on the half way line by Jesus and finds himself out of position so makes no attempt to play the ball and hauls him down which is a 100% yellow card offence. Apparently this is an injustice?

We don't even have to touch on the hilarity of Rodri at the end and the conduct of their fans in the corner.

But now we get these kind of rants from C-list comedians venting their spleen about the culture of Cities owners with oil and desert references? WOW, just wow.

They are all on the verge of picking up their ball and not playing - drink it in....
Click to expand...
On 1)… I don’t think Ederson did get the ball, I think Odegard studded Ederson’s ankle before he was able to get to the ball. It should have been a City free kick, not an Arsenal corner.

and 3)… Gabriel was booked for dissent after the penalty was scored as the teams were lining back up for the kick off, not for scuffing the pen spot
 
JASR said:
And don't forget no yellow (and apparently no retrospective action) for Saka going into crowd after scoring? This lack of yellow (one rule for them, one rule for Sterling... and twice as worse now with covid), is doubly important, as he got a yellow in the 63rd minute, so they should be down to 9 men for 30 minutes.
Click to expand...
Indeed. And we could have had a penalty or at worst an indirect free kick in the box when Partey had hold of Jesus in the first half.

Partey also put his hands on the ref when Gabriel was getting his second yellow. It was very briefly, but he still did it.
 
Psychedelic Casual said:
Indeed. There’s a bit of a backstory to go with that corrupt 1919 Arsenal promotion…

The season before (which was 1914-15 due to WW1), clubs didn’t know at the time that there was to be no relegation and it would be assumed that the bottom two clubs went down as usual. The three clubs in danger of relegation were Spurs, Chelsea, and United.

On the final day, United played Liverpool and both clubs agreed to fix the match in order to keep United up! United won 2-0.

Yes, those two, that so-called “biggest rivalry in English football” (or, more accurately, known as the made up media rivalry between two clubs who are best mates in the boardroom and use each other to promote themselves to the thick masses of morons who fall for it!) colluding together and helping each other out.

Now, I know Billy Meredith and a few other City players were found guilty of offering bungs to Villa players… but we were punished for that, we actually do know it did happen (unlike the Cartel of know-nowts who know nowt about their true histories!), and we don’t pretend it never happened.
Click to expand...
I love the fact you despise the rancid and corrupt ‘Woolwich Arsenal’ myth almost as much as I do, Psych.
These cunts have been throwing Lego under our bare feet since we stole ‘their’ Champions League place and took their better players.
Entitled Tarquins. Crooks. American-owned racists and hypocrites
Fuck Arsenal, I hope they go bust
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top