Oh good, fresh meat.
AliceAyres said:
LongsightM13 said:
See the rag racists are finally showing their true colours. Don't you have something better to do, like suck Nick Griffin's cock or something?
I couldn't you were already there! On a serious note this apparent takeover is by a group of wealthy individuals who are United fans and prepared to put in their own money cash (not borrowed) with a supporters trust given a controlling interest. Obviously the brothers Grimm have to agree to sell and at the moment are saying they're not interested but as we all know everything has a price a bit like when a club rejects an initial offer for one of it's players to bump the price up.
The Glazers are by far the best thing that has ever happened to your club, and will make you the most cash rich in the world if you guys would just shut up and engage your brain for a second. These investment bankers do NOT have £1bn liquid between 50 of them, absolutely guaranteed. Investment bankers aren't rich, the people who employ investment bankers are the rich ones. It's like trying to get 50 former players together, they just cannot raise that type of money.
The Glazers won't sell United because unlike all of your Green and Gold brigade (who never seem to be in attendence in the last 15 minutes of a game, my United friend noted), they are billionaires because they make high risk business decisions and have the know-how to power them through. They aren't on the dole, or doing whatever pretend job you are about to make up that you do. Leave business to the people who have a proven track record in it.
Also, if you actually want your club to be run by fans and not businessmen, then you have to be living in a dream world.
No fan would have sold Ronaldo for £80m, despite the fact that it was a good business move. They also would pay Rooney or whoever the next terrace hero is, anything they so desire.
Having 50 owners in a football club is the worst thing that I could possibly imagine, for anyone.
Behind the derison in this thread I'm detecting the fear amongst you all that someone is gonna come along and piss on your bonfire. Let's not forget that your sugar daddy sheikh could withdraw his backing at any time. The hundreds of millions he's already blown is, as you keep pointing out pocket change, therefore on that basis it's also pocket change for him to lose if he decides that he doesn't want to be assoaciated with apparent failure for a prolonged period. In football normal rules of business do not apply.
You were all warned by the forum leader last week that the negativity within the club has been noted by the owner.
As a former forum leader, I can tell you that the last part is just shite. Contrary to popular belief, the Sheikh doesn't read Bluemoon, he's a bit too busy running his country and vast multi-billion pound empire.
By your logic, we'd have been better with a skint owner because he is well invested into the club? Utterly ridiculous.
You obviously have no idea who the Sheikh is, why he put money in to the club, or what his investment track record is. I'd tell you to look it up, but I'd fear that you'd probably just kill yourself with jealousy.
In fact, look it up.
