Rag Takeover

AliceAyres, one quick point for you.

"Ric" is the forum owner.

"Ricster" is just another poster, who has nothing to do with the running of the site.

Now stop trying convince yourself that being owned by 50 "sort of rich" people is better then being owned by one "rich beyond imagination" person (our Sheik).

BLUE AND WHITE 'CAUSE THE RAGS ARE SHITE!
 
mancboy123 said:
There are more holes in this takeover plan than a piece of swiss cheese, yet all of you blindly repeat the mantra of its a good its a good thing without actually knowing any intricate details whatsoever.

Basically what you have put is all supposition with no thought to where the money is coming from ( a group of wealthy backers ) what is this a bond film, a supporters trust ( yeah because its quite plainly a good idea to have the inmates running the asylum ). To a man the average united fan has absolutely no idea what this supposed red knights idea entails apart from a few press sounbites to make it look attractive.

With all due respect you tell us not to bite the hand that feeds us, the same could be said to you under the glazers stewardship you have won 3 premier league titles, a european cup and 2 carling cups, yet you want to get rid of them to have a clean slate, with you lot it really is a case of better the devil you know.


I didn't tell you not to bite the hand that feeds you, that was a post put up by one of your own fans last week pointing out that the sheikh could walk away at any time. I agree that this proposed takeover has no substance at this time but the basic principle of the club being owned by people who are supposed to be United fans with the potential for a supporters trust interest is a good one. A also agree that United have enjoyed fantastic success under the Glazers but would argue that we'd have that success if Utd were still a PLC. Clearly the Glazers have a massive interest in United 's continued success as they've sunk £250m of their own money into the deal. It will be interesting to see if they can be forced out and if the alternative really is better than the current arrangement.
 
Whoever you are, AliceAyers, you've proved once and for all that you really are the epitome of sheep. You know absolutely sweet Fanny Adams about the red knights and their proposal to 'rescue' your side from the clutches of the evil Americans. All you do is quote whatever you've read in the rag-supporting media.
If you looked carefully into the details surrounding these so-called red knights you'd realise that the only way they could possibly afford a takeover would be by yet more debt. Even then it would depend entirely upon Uncle Malcolm selling up (something he has repeatedly stated he has no intention of doing. And why the fuck would he? He can milk that vile club you claim to support for every penny you morons pay into it).


It's one thing to be envious of the fact that our owner is a billionaire and things are on the up for City, but it's another thing altogether to blithely swallow the soundbites coming from the rag-loving tabloids and accuse us of being sheep.
 
AliceAyres said:
mancboy123 said:
There are more holes in this takeover plan than a piece of swiss cheese, yet all of you blindly repeat the mantra of its a good its a good thing without actually knowing any intricate details whatsoever.

Basically what you have put is all supposition with no thought to where the money is coming from ( a group of wealthy backers ) what is this a bond film, a supporters trust ( yeah because its quite plainly a good idea to have the inmates running the asylum ). To a man the average united fan has absolutely no idea what this supposed red knights idea entails apart from a few press sounbites to make it look attractive.

With all due respect you tell us not to bite the hand that feeds us, the same could be said to you under the glazers stewardship you have won 3 premier league titles, a european cup and 2 carling cups, yet you want to get rid of them to have a clean slate, with you lot it really is a case of better the devil you know.


I didn't tell you not to bite the hand that feeds you, that was a post put up by one of your own fans last week pointing out that the sheikh could walk away at any time. I agree that this proposed takeover has no substance at this time but the basic principle of the club being owned by people who are supposed to be United fans with the potential for a supporters trust interest is a good one. A also agree that United have enjoyed fantastic success under the Glazers but would argue that we'd have that success if Utd were still a PLC. Clearly the Glazers have a massive interest in United 's continued success as they've sunk £250m of their own money into the deal. It will be interesting to see if they can be forced out and if the alternative really is better than the current arrangement.

Of course they can......just wave a few more green & yellow scarfs, that should do it!!!
 
dd7bbfcdddcf56ccc5c0afb6ab218b22.jpg

oii, alice are you the thick bastard in the black shirt or the silly twat dressed head to toe in red merchandise?..........love this picture it's almost as funny as the 'mancs not yanks' dickhead with a yankees baseball cap on....ha ha fuckin thick red (sorry green and gold) coooooonts.
 
listen you thick rag twat ..i know you redscum fookers are are not the brightest but please try to take in this quote from the Glazer family (bless em )

"NOT FOR SALE" ...thats right not for sale til at least 2017 so calm down it aint gonna happen but if it makes you feel better go and buy a green and yellow scarf from my mates stall near the swamp he`s a city fan and is making a killing from you muppets
 
You mean like they were doing at the Carling Cup Final, BlueHefner? Sad rags!

The chance to win a trophy during their ownership and they choose to protest against them instead.
 
colin's bell helmet said:
dd7bbfcdddcf56ccc5c0afb6ab218b22.jpg

oii, alice are you the thick bastard in the black shirt or the silly twat dressed head to toe in red merchandise?..........love this picture it's almost as funny as the 'mancs not yanks' dickhead with a yankees baseball cap on....ha ha fuckin thick red (sorry green and gold) coooooonts.

Green and Yellow you mean.
 
AliceAyres said:
mancboy123 said:
There are more holes in this takeover plan than a piece of swiss cheese, yet all of you blindly repeat the mantra of its a good its a good thing without actually knowing any intricate details whatsoever.

Basically what you have put is all supposition with no thought to where the money is coming from ( a group of wealthy backers ) what is this a bond film, a supporters trust ( yeah because its quite plainly a good idea to have the inmates running the asylum ). To a man the average united fan has absolutely no idea what this supposed red knights idea entails apart from a few press sounbites to make it look attractive.

With all due respect you tell us not to bite the hand that feeds us, the same could be said to you under the glazers stewardship you have won 3 premier league titles, a european cup and 2 carling cups, yet you want to get rid of them to have a clean slate, with you lot it really is a case of better the devil you know.


I didn't tell you not to bite the hand that feeds you, that was a post put up by one of your own fans last week pointing out that the sheikh could walk away at any time. I agree that this proposed takeover has no substance at this time but the basic principle of the club being owned by people who are supposed to be United fans with the potential for a supporters trust interest is a good one. A also agree that United have enjoyed fantastic success under the Glazers but would argue that we'd have that success if Utd were still a PLC. Clearly the Glazers have a massive interest in United 's continued success as they've sunk £250m of their own money into the deal. It will be interesting to see if they can be forced out and if the alternative really is better than the current arrangement.


but in the meantime you are willing for your ill informed and financially naive football tourists in their Delia scarves to undermine the achievements under the Glazers, unsettle the CEO, ignore the Managers view on the Glazers and perhaps affect the performance of the team - AND all for something that you have no idea will be an improvement or not.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.