AntiUnited
Well-Known Member
cuz he was right !! why should he feel sad lol.
SuperYaya said:A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play." It clarifies: "Excessive force means that the player has far exceeded the necessary use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent."
Unbelievable that people are even arguing it wasn't a red. So studding a player in the stomach A) Is necessary force and B) has no danger of injuring him?
Nowhere is intent mentioned, it makes no difference if Nani didn't see him.
bluetrue said:SuperYaya said:I like the one where they say 'shame the ref ruined the game.'
Actually I think it was Nani who ruined the game for you.
Make sure we all vote 'yes' on the Guardian 'red or not red' poll. Stop them from spouting more about 'injustice.'
http://gu.com/p/3e8pm/tw
Jnr Kisby said:48 seconds
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=BLITtiHeUyM#" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... ITtiHeUyM#</a>!
Nani looks at Arbeloa, he knows where he is. Referee got it right.
I said the same thing to some plastic at work this morning. But as usual when something goes against them the response was well the rule is wrong. The rules have been in place for 100 years or so but they need changing as soon as they dont benefit the scum. I tried to put it as simple as I could for him. Did Nani get the ball? no. Did he kick Arbeloa in the chest? yes. Well that's a red card then. He's still not having itSuperYaya said:A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play." It clarifies: "Excessive force means that the player has far exceeded the necessary use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent."
Unbelievable that people are even arguing it wasn't a red. So studding a player in the stomach A) Is necessary force and B) has no danger of injuring him?
Nowhere is intent mentioned, it makes no difference if Nani didn't see him.
Sean85 said:I said the same thing to some plastic at work this morning. But as usual when something goes against them the response was well the rule is wrong. The rules have been in place for 100 years or so but they need changing as soon as they dont benefit the scum. I tried to put it as simple as I could for him. Did Nani get the ball? no. Did he kick Arbeloa in the chest? yes. Well that's a red card then. He's still not having itSuperYaya said:A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play." It clarifies: "Excessive force means that the player has far exceeded the necessary use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent."
Unbelievable that people are even arguing it wasn't a red. So studding a player in the stomach A) Is necessary force and B) has no danger of injuring him?
Nowhere is intent mentioned, it makes no difference if Nani didn't see him.
Former United midfielder Lou Macari branded Cakir's performance 'rubbish'.
'I thought it was a strange decision - a referee from Turkey who we hadn't heard of. He had no great reputation of being one of the top referees,' he told BBC 5 Live.
'I must say last night our fans done us + our club proud. Best/loudest support I've heard at ANY ground throughout my career. Thank you,' posted Ferdinand, who also posted that he hadn't slept after the game.