Most strikers fail to score with over 70% of their shots.
but others are more likely to score chances as well.
For example if Sterling or Salah go through on goal with the same chance I would expect Salah to score many more times than Sterling.
Most strikers fail to score with over 70% of their shots.
but others are more likely to score chances as well.
For example if Sterling or Salah go through on goal with the same chance I would expect Salah to score many more times than Sterling.
but others are more likely to score chances as well.
For example if Sterling or Salah go through on goal with the same chance I would expect Salah to score many more times than Sterling.
Yet Sterling has a higher conversion rate.
And yet Salah has a worse conversion ratio than Sterling.
Conversion ratio from one on ones? Or just in general? I presume Kane has a worse conversion rate than Sterling too, just from the sheer amount of shots he takes.
And yet Salah has a worse conversion ratio than Sterling.
Snap.
I think no-one here would say hes a better finisher than Kane or Salah for example. Its a level he needs to get to if he wants to stay at the top.
I guess it depends on the definition of conversion rate. What I am trying to get across Sterling will miss more easy chances than these other guys. I think no-one here would say hes a better finisher than Kane or Salah for example. Its a level he needs to get to if he wants to stay at the top.