Wretched Vengeance
Well-Known Member
City definitely had the best of him.
And yet he was consistently the first name on the team sheet, often ahead of Sane, who most people would claim was the better technical player and better finisher. In reality, Sterling's off the ball movement was world class and his workrate was fantastic, which is why he was always on the end of balls that others would be nowhere near.Agree. To me he looked very much a player who benefited from being surrounded by far better players than himself.
Now obviously most players are going to look better when surrounded by top players, but to me you could have replaced him with other effective wingers at that time and they'd have done equally as well if not better.
Fair enough. I agree about his workrate and off the ball movement, which are definitely his biggest strengths as a player.And yet he was consistently the first name on the team sheet, often ahead of Sane, who most people would claim was the better technical player and better finisher. In reality, Sterling's off the ball movement was world class and his workrate was fantastic, which is why he was always on the end of balls that others would be nowhere near.
You werent a fan of raz even when he was goodI notice I have agreed with you as a poster generally, but respectfully, don't agree with that at all. Now I am not saying Neto will be a success there, as they're a basket case, but technically - first touch, dribbling, link-up - I'd say he has more tools to his game than Sterling. Certainly an out-of-form Sterling. Prime Sterling is more effective - but Neto when fit (which is rare) is more of a maverick. Neto to me looks like more of a natural footballer. Sterling has never looked like a natural footballer to me - he takes scrappy touches, makes technical errors etc.
But then I have never been much of a fan of Sterling, even when he was good. I said he was a player well on the way down when he signed there, and wouldn't do anything for Chelsea. Still time for him to prove me wrong but not looking good for him. To be fair the club is a mess so he's only partially responsible for his poorness.
But overall, he was a pointless signing for Chelsea as he wasn't going to improve them. Nobody can though really, due to the systemic issues they have as a club.
I see that you have "neutral" listed as "team supported".He made the point he'd have scored even more (over 200) if he had football IQ and finishing ability.
That City team Sterling was in was sensational and he was accommodated very well despite being one of the least talented players in the side. I believe he was made to look far better than he is by probably the best coach ever.
I expect he is talking bollocks , it a team full of talent so are we going to say kev only looked good because he played with good players ? I just dont get the hatred for raz , he just couldnt fucking win with some peopleI see that you have "neutral" listed as "team supported".
I'm curious as to how much of City did you watch while Sterling was with us?
He made the point he'd have scored even more (over 200) if he had football IQ and finishing ability.
That City team Sterling was in was sensational and he was accommodated very well despite being one of the least talented players in the side. I believe he was made to look far better than he is by probably the best coach ever.
And the brilliant cross to spark the comeback against Villa, on the final day of the 21/22 season.He may have been frustrating at times, but he certainly did what was needed for us at times.
some last-minute winners for one.
And the brilliant cross to spark the comeback against Villa, on the final day of the 21/22 season.
See the Ilkay Gündoğan thread in the transfer forum.