NopeIn terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.
I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
NopeIn terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.
I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.
I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.
I think we can agree Milner played better than Sterling last year as well.
49m for sterling, what a joke. How is he more than Silva & Aguero, liverpool must be laughing thier heads off.
City fans slag off Sky Sports, yet they are watching it... Don't understand that lol
ISCO IS NOT AVAILABLE or otherwise there would be fucking queue of clubs after him. Fucks sake this is not football manager.I'd pay 25-30 million for him maximum. As I said before I'd rather have both Isco+pedro because at least they would understand pellegrini's system and ideas. We could then have bought green or butland for the home grown quota
I'd pay 25-30 million for him maximum. As I said before I'd rather have both Isco+pedro because at least they would understand pellegrini's system and ideas. We could then have bought green or butland for the home grown quota
No we haven't, Milner saw his contract out with us (you know like Sterling didn't), we had Milner at his prime (unlike you), and when will you lot actually work out that you're NOT getting £49m because 20% goes to QPR.In terms of the deal, youve given us Milner in his prime + £49million for Raheem Sterling.