SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,774
I don't.And yet Kovacic is a year older than Sterling with a far less impressive record in a much inferior league.
So I wonder what you are basing your opinion on.
I don't.And yet Kovacic is a year older than Sterling with a far less impressive record in a much inferior league.
So I wonder what you are basing your opinion on.
If we pay that for him then he obviously fucking is, to us.
Would Chelsea pay 50m for Sterling? Would Utd? Would Arsenal?
No I don't think they would. Reason being is, he is not worth the money.
I'll
Take your word for it.
My laptop has a virus so I haven't been on champs manager to check.
Neither are home grown though and we will have strengthened our squad and it will still be superior to theirs kiddo.
I don't.
No one said he is worth more than Aguero.I'm always happy, I live a good life.
I'm just a little bit more ruthless with my views, no harm in that. No harm in being different and not following the crowd
Your not getting the point... I said I would happily take Sterling because he is the best player in his age group in England, but he is nowhere near worth more than Aguero. Not having that.
I'm always happy, I live a good life.
I'm just a little bit more ruthless with my views, no harm in that. No harm in being different and not following the crowd
Your not getting the point... I said I would happily take Sterling because he is the best player in his age group in England, but he is nowhere near worth more than Aguero. Not having that.
Why?I wouldn't go any higher than 40m, Liverpool will give in at some point, no point bidding towards the 50m mark.
Just like when they bought Markovic, Lalana and Balotelli with the Suarez money?
We are buying(by the looks of it) a top class player who will fit our system. Liverpool are buying Europa League players and will try and make a system
They bought quantity over quality last year and looks like they'll do the same again