You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling - Done - See main forum
- Thread starter Kippax.
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't be so sure. The owners have shown they are no push over. They love Iba and progress him and leave Sterling it's not beyond the realms of impossible
It's not beyond the realms but it's idiotic
I wouldn't be so sure. The owners have shown they are no push over. They love Iba and progress him and leave Sterling it's not beyond the realms of impossible
Theyre running a business at the end of the day though and theyre not fans.
Genuinely do not understand the mindset of the club right now.
You don't understand trying to avoid paying more money than we have to?
avoidconfusion
Well-Known Member
Theyre running a business at the end of the day though and theyre not fans.
They do strike me as the kind of idiots that would cut of their noses to spite their face though
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
No chance he'll be chucked in the stiffs and cost them millions in lost transfer fees, he would if the fans had the final say but the owners won't lose that kind of money.
Man city fan 72
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 729
They won't think twice about letting him rot in the reserves, they're as stubborn as fuck at Liverpool, and won't want to look as though they've caved in against us. We both end up losers in this fiasco.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
And yet again more negativity from you.Yeah It is you just wonder why they won't put the extra money to get this over the line
Txiki Txiki Bang Bang
Well-Known Member
You don't understand trying to avoid paying more money than we have to?
Tried to explain this to some posters here about a week ago. I told them there's no way we would pay 50M. Sterling is beyond redemption now, he would never get the support of LFC fans, quite similar to the incident between Nasri and Arsenal fans. there's only one possible outcome here.We don't need to spend higher than we have to. They would break eventually.
Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
They won't think twice about letting him rot in the reserves, they're as stubborn as fuck at Liverpool, and won't want to look as though they've caved in against us. We both end up losers in this fiasco.
You think Henry will let Brenda waste £50m like that? I don't.
ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
Can't see any club paying £50m for him so he either rots away for a season and Liverpool have a very negative dressing room or we sign him for the price we have now offered.
Bad business move by Liverpool if they stay with their stubbornness.
Bad business move by Liverpool if they stay with their stubbornness.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,100
I know this won't happen but our board should publically take the piss by increasing our bid on a daily, or twice daily, basis by little increments - £100k at a time for example.
kippaxwarrior
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 23,472
- Location
- Jupiter Mining Corporation Red Dwarf
- Team supported
- City of course!!
MCRJON has said its a done deal and that's good enough for me. He's joining up with the squad in Australia
Liverpool are trying to protect their reputation and perceived status to their own fans and others. The rolling out of Gerrard, carragher, et al to chip away at Sterlings character is however embarrassing to anyone who doesn't blindly believe the tabloid garbage. It does however make it harder to get this deal done, the more stubborn they get the tougher it will be. This may roll on to the end of August!!
F
F
failsworthblueboy
Guest
They won't think twice about letting him rot in the reserves, they're as stubborn as fuck at Liverpool, and won't want to look as though they've caved in against us. We both end up losers in this fiasco.
Sorry I don't agree, left in the reserves to rot will do nothing for anyone, his value will depreciate and if he's there for 2 years, he's on a free. At the end of the day its business and the deal will be done, one way or another.
Tried to explain this to some posters here about a week ago. I told them there's no way we would pay 50M. Sterling is beyond redemption now, he would never get the support of LFC fans, quite similar to the incident between Nasri and Arsenal fans. there's only one possible outcome here.We don't need to spend higher than we have to. They would break eventually.
He has to leave this summer. I have no idea what's going on behind the scenes, but we all have to be very confident it will happen. If we pulled out over £5m I would be gutted/livid if I was sterling! I'm sure we won't - interesting to see if we do end up having to
Pay £50m though.
Weren't you supposed to be dipping your rod in the Lakes ;)
I assure you that I'll be out of here quicker than Sterling at a Jimmy Tarbuck show as soon as we sign our first big player that tests the servers!
Liverpool are trying to protect their reputation and perceived status to their own fans and others. The rolling out of Gerrard, carragher, et al to chip away at Sterlings character is however embarrassing to anyone who doesn't blindly believe the tabloid garbage. It does however make it harder to get this deal done, the more stubborn they get the tougher it will be. This may roll on to the end of August!!
That's their biggest problem.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.