mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
How do you know that for sure?That’s always been the case
How do you know that for sure?That’s always been the case
Not a City info drop, Mike McGrath is not someone City go with, certainly if nobody else has it.
He used to be close to Sterling's former agent Aidy Ward, but that association to Raheem is over.
Raheem would not be telling McGrath a City slant, certainly because he wouldn't need to.
He would go straight to City if he was showing any inclination to resuming contract talks and he hasn't.
All stories city have briefed have said this... Sterling is the one who stopped talks because he wants to see what his game time is like before signing a new contract which is fair enoughHow do you know that for sure?
So just stories and assumptionsAll stories city have briefed have said this... Sterling is the one who stopped talks because he wants to see what his game time is like before signing a new contract which is fair enough
I get that Maly. Simple question if he were available today would we buy him?
Does this mean City wants to give him a new improved contract?
Top post mate this is spot onHe's a regular starter for his international side and only 26 years old. Name me players of his age and experience who we could replace him with for £40m. Declan Rice is rated at £100m. Would you sign Rice for Sterling and £60m. I certainly wouldn't. I do wish posters would stop totally undervaluing our players.
Donny van der Beek cost £40m, would you straight swap Raheem for him?