You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling | Joins Chelsea for £50m
- Thread starter Blue Smarties
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Top post mate this is spot on
To use vlahovic as an example as they both have same contact length, he has had a good 12 months and is valued at £80 million double that of what people are saying Sterling is worth ? Somebody explain that because I can’t get my head around it
hazard went for £100 million at 28 years old with just 12 months left on his deal
Sterling is 2 years younger and his goals and assists In the premier league are near identical to what hazards was .
if we wanted to sign Sterling now for instance it would be easily £80 + million, for fuck sake that **** Sancho just went for that and he’s half the player Sterling is
As you so rightly say.. it’s absolute bonkers mate. A premier league star for nearly a decade and only just entering his prime. Granted, might be out of form for his club but he was arguably the best attacker at the flipping European Championships which was only in the summer and dragged England to their first final in over half a century. Large media presence with his fight against racism.. ultimate professional.. £40 mil? Are we stupid?? that is the type of fee you expect to pay for a mid table central midfielder.. not a top attacking talent for a decent Champions league club (which is where he will go). Bonkers.
absolute madness. He’s not even old!
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
Sterling is on 10x Vlahovic and more than Hazard was at Chelsea in wages alone.Top post mate this is spot on
To use vlahovic as an example as they both have same contact length, he has had a good 12 months and is valued at £80 million double that of what people are saying Sterling is worth ? Somebody explain that because I can’t get my head around it
hazard went for £100 million at 28 years old with just 12 months left on his deal
Sterling is 2 years younger and his goals and assists In the premier league are near identical to what hazards was .
if we wanted to sign Sterling now for instance it would be easily £80 + million, for fuck sake that **** Sancho just went for that and he’s half the player Sterling is
Real and Barca burnt millions on Hazard and Dembele and Coutinho. No club is going to make that mistake again.
If he leaves for 40/50m that would be good business, frees up wages and gives us immediate firepower in the window.
LOL, I am a visionary ;)he must have heard you
NZBlue
Well-Known Member
Great player who needs to rediscover his mojo. Send him out on loan to barca or whoever but only if he signs an extension so he is still our player when the loan finishes. If we don't want him back after the loan sell him then.
If he won't sign an extension then no loan, simple as that
If he won't sign an extension then no loan, simple as that
In what world does 40 / 50 million give us immediate firepower in the window ?Sterling is on 10x Vlahovic and more than Hazard was at Chelsea in wages alone.
Real and Barca burnt millions on Hazard and Dembele and Coutinho. No club is going to make that mistake again.
If he leaves for 40/50m that would be good business, frees up wages and gives us immediate firepower in the window.
just remember that gets you a Nathan ake or a wan bissaka these days .
TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 4,030
Many, many clubs will continue to overpay and makes mistakes in signing players. Whether by fee or wages. It's the nature of the game.Sterling is on 10x Vlahovic and more than Hazard was at Chelsea in wages alone.
Real and Barca burnt millions on Hazard and Dembele and Coutinho. No club is going to make that mistake again.
If he leaves for 40/50m that would be good business, frees up wages and gives us immediate firepower in the window.
colesy
Well-Known Member
Our problem is that Sterling is worth what another team will pay for him, and we are not in a great position with only a year and a half left on his contract. As with the other players that want out, I would let him go if we can obtain a recent amount for him, but I am unsure who would/could buy him.
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
Pays off Alf and Raiola as a starter.In what world does 40 / 50 million give us immediate firepower in the window ?
just remember that gets you a Nathan ake or a wan bissaka these days .
Not to the amount that is been thrown about in here and certainly not over 100m like Hazard and Dembele.Many, many clubs will continue to overpay and makes mistakes in signing players. Whether by fee or wages. It's the nature of the game.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.