We are lucky the quality of the rest of our squad has managed to alleviate Sterling's misses during the time he's been here. Are people forgetting the 3-2 defeat to United when we could have clinched the title 7 games out, were 2-0 up at half time and Sterling had missed 3 sitters that my dead mother could have scored? And as for this talk about pace well it's a myth. He's no Sane and I'd even argue that Tevez was faster at running from halfway with the ball and can recall countless goals he scored by doing that. What little pace Sterling has is over 10 yards and is very quickly nullified by his less than great control. For me we've had the best of him and if we can recoup anything approaching what we paid for him then it's a no brainer.
By that logic, the rest of the squad are lucky that Sterling's goals & assists alleviated their misses or inability to score in games where he helped open the scoring, brought us level and/or scored the winner? Which he's done on countless occasions for City.
The revisionism about Sterling from his own fanbase is absolutely absurd.