I'm not saying not wearing the laces makes them homophobic, Ric.
You certainly seemed to imply that, unless I’m missing something?
I'm not saying not wearing the laces makes them homophobic, Ric.
Ric i should imagine they wernt given any .I cant see the players ever lacing their own boots they will just see their kit ready and stick it on .thats my take on it any wayThat was obligatory, pretty much, I think. City as a club seemingly embrace the campaign, but it seems odd that the players didn’t wear the laces. Am genuinely intrigued why they didn’t. Did other clubs’ players largely wear them?
Not one City player wore the rainbow laces today.
You certainly seemed to imply that, unless I’m missing something?
All of these players have boot deals. I wouldn't be surprised if it's in the terms of those deals that they use the laces provided. Perhaps their sponsors didn't want their boots tinkered with. Perhaps we've a kit man with more important things to do than bug 22 players to ask each of them if they'd like their boots done up.
As a slight digression; I find it disappointing that by publicly backing the Stonewall campaign our influential players could really make a difference and they actively chose not to. Which could suggest some kind of homophobia on a subconscious level at the very least.
I think the lack of current players willing to come out, presumably because they fear being targeted by rival fans, shows that this is still a very real issue.
I don’t buy that. No sponsor in their right mind would dictate that rainbow laces couldn’t be used, and equally it would’ve taken minimal effort for the kitman to lace up their boots with different laces. Not saying for a second that there’s a sinister reason for it, more likely complacency, but I still think it’s poor that none of our players wore them on “Rainbow Laces” weekend.
Again, saying they “actively” chose not to is a leap of judgement.
I think this is a double standard for people though.
Who's business is it really if a player is gay and who gives anyone the right to pressure them into becoming the champion of a cause?
Football is their profession. Their sexual preferences shouldn't come into it, much like any modern workplace.
There's an underlying "we need to know who" behind all of this. If there are players(which their undoubtedly are) who wish to focus on football and keep their private lives private, they should be respected for that, but I see a pressure there for these people to do something that has no impact on their on field performances so until someone chooses to make that a part of their public life, the approach from everyone shouldn't be a constant wondering of "why or when one will come out".