RANGERS AND CELTIC

Re: RANGERS

Robbo. said:
stony said:
Attendance wasn't that bad according to sky.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/match_facts/0,19762,11065_3004983,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/match ... 83,00.html</a>

just watched the goals on telly and it looked empty


The goal was in the 90th minute, so a load of them had probably fucked off early.
 
Re: RANGERS

think i got the result a little wrong.both celtic and rangers get beat.good news for the chasing pack!
 
Re: RANGERS

Whilst it was never top quality the football north of the border, it has in my opinion deteriorated much as Italian football has, and if this top 4 nonsense carries on here the Prem will deteriorate, over dominance tends to ruin things
 
Re: RANGERS

I apologise in advance to anyone upset by this post. Scottish football is a total irrelevance. The trophies won up there mean nothing to anyone outside of Scotland. Rangers & Celtic have huge support and despite that have no money. Unless they find a way into our league (which appears impossible) they will never achieve anything meaningful again.
 
Re: RANGERS

blue62 said:
I apologise in advance to anyone upset by this post. Scottish football is a total irrelevance. The trophies won up there mean nothing to anyone outside of Scotland. Rangers & Celtic have huge support and despite that have no money. Unless they find a way into our league (which appears impossible) they will never achieve anything meaningful again.
They appear in European finals which is something English clubs (other than the big 4) don't do.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.