Rate this season

Its not very often teams have good away records against the top 6, even champions. Usually a couple of wins is pretty good going.

Spurs for example have 1 away win in 3 seasons against the top 6 under Poch. That was against us when Clattrnburg gave that "handball" against Sterling last season.

What I would say though which I think is really important to your point...

If we secure one more point then it's the best top flight away record in the entire history of the club.
And that will be because we have some great attacking players who thrive when there is more space as there often is in away games. At home however - total shite because our slow lethargic build up play doesn't work when teams put 10 behind the ball.
We were great first 10 games when we were constantly "in the opposition faces as soon" as we lost the ball. Then Fernandinho did an interview that said he didn't think the team could keep up that tempo all season - and hey presto- immediately the pressing stopped (Celtic outdid us at it) and since then we have been Pelligrinis team all over again but with just better attacking options
 
Bravo and sane make 2 new additions mate. Plus he chose not to put nolito in the squad which would have been 3, 2 in outfield positions. I think he may have slept with Peps wife or something.
It's a weird one, he's clearly a really good player and there's been times this season where we really could've done with him.
 
6.5/10 from the playing point of view as we clearly need a deadwood clear out and additions to fit Pep's style.

For the stardard of match officials.

bY7SMXI.jpg
 
Last edited:
Some brilliant football but also some slow boring rubbish. Too many changes players don't seem to play as team or know what they're meant to be doing. We're becoming bottlers in the big games. Some bizarre selections and substitutions. Would Conte have gotten more out of this squad, definitely. So 5/10 for me.
 
talking just about the premier league here now, and part of the issue is that most of the other teams, apart from arsenal, have all improved upon last year.

if you look at last years table we won 19 games, lost 10, scored 71, conceeded 41 and ended up with 66 points. finished 4th.

with 6 games still too play, we already have won 19 games, lost only 6 so far, scored 63 and conceeded 35 and already have 64 points.

so we should improve on last years figures and hopefully final position.

so maybe its not all as bad as what some people make out? its not fantastic dont get me wrong, but hardly disastrous either. premier league wise.
 
5/10 for me, very disappointing, that said, it could have been so much better if a few decisions had gone our way and our finishing was up to standard.. I just want this season out of the way and see City come out all guns blazing next season, with some of the dead wood gone and new blood in who can deliver what is asked of them..
 
4//10. Took a day to think about it too. The minimum expected is champions league football next year, and getting that will bring it to a 5 for me.

I didn't expect to walk the league but what I did expect was to see a tandem of a vibrant new system with young players bedded in.

Instead we've been treated to last years players sugar coated with Sane and briefly Jesus.

The only plus points for me are the growth of Sterling & Stones, but we saw Stones cost us a bunch of games early on, so the cost short term was extremely high.

Then there's the keeper issue, I won't even start.

In hindsight it was also horrific management to allow United a free shot at the Capital One Cup, even though I gave Pep the benefit of the doubt at the time. Losing out in the EMIRATES Cup(because they own it, not the FA) makes that a stupid decision in hindsight.

But the damning thing for me has been the lack of even attempting to give youth a chance. Garcia and Maffeo looked great when played, but then relegated to limbo. Navas has played well, but he's off. Maffeo should have been retained and played, unless Pep wants rid of him next year.
 
Their squad isn't a patch on ours.

How many of theirs would replace the corresponding one of ours? Not many.

The sad but simple fact is this. For all mourinho is a hateful twat, he's a far far better manager than the fella we waited four years and two managers for.

Mourinho came to England and thrived. Pep has come and looks broken by it.

I'm waiting for the excuses next season. "He's had to bed in x number of new players so this is a transitional season. Again" or god forbid "he couldn't get 'his' players in as he couldn't offer champions league"

That's what you think the reality is United have a much younger squad, as well as in many positions they have better depth in compared to City. Mou took over a much better Chelsea side when he first came if that's what your speaking about, who had a more balance squad.

He seems to be doing OK without spending anything. You may not like his style but he's a far better manager of resources than many of the more glitzy names.

Yes, but doesn't mean he'd be good taking over a squad worth millions, we've seen this fail many times. Some managers do well with lower teams, but not top others do well with top and not lower, some maybe able to do both.
 
Mourinho is also not the man who first arrived in England a decade ago. He looks a bit broken by his Madrid and Chelsea, 2nd time round, experiences.

But his first season at Chelsea was way more impressive than Guardiola's efforts this year. The essential problem for me this year was the signings. We brought in young players with a view to the future, Sadly the positions they play in were not our problem areas on the park. Had we brought in Mendy and Fabinho say instead of Sane and Gabriel Jesus we would no doubt have had a much better season.

Still it's great we have signed two such talented forward players before anyone else did.

Let's be honest I doubt many people in the football world knew who Mendy and Fabinho were before the rise of Monaco.

I don't entirely blame Pep or City for buying those young players, football is also a business when players like that are in the market it's hard to veto them. BM told Sane he'd be 2nd or 3rd choice and they wanted him to wait a year so his fee can drop a little City got him instead, I bet now their kicking themselves since they rely on 2, 33 year old on the wings.

I think this summers transfer is a little more difficult then people think, City have 13 players who are 30 and over, players that are hard to sell, especially since some of their contracts are running down some clubs are probably waiting till their free to take instead. City probably also have some form of wage bill in place and amount they don't want to exceed, Nasri/Bony/Hart combined are making £330K weekly, while Kompany is making £120K and Yaya £220K, so weekly City are paying £670K on players who aren't apart of Pep plan, one has injury problems while the other is 33 years old. These players are also hard to sell because clubs probably don't want to pay them the money they want. Bony is getting paid 100K, how many clubs will pay him that?

Sane is making £55K weekly, as bad as Bravo is I saw that he's only making £10K, Stones is £100K, Gundo £120K, Nolito £100K, Jesus is probably earning a little less then £100K I would believe.

Perhaps City and Pep were in the market, but they had a hard time tracking actually proper talent. Outside of Bravo and maybe Nolito I don't think City had a bad transfer window tbh they may have not strengthen what they needed it, but that doesn't mean the transfer window was bad in itself.
 
Let's be honest I doubt many people in the football world knew who Mendy and Fabinho were before the rise of Monaco.

I don't entirely blame Pep or City for buying those young players, football is also a business when players like that are in the market it's hard to veto them. BM told Sane he'd be 2nd or 3rd choice and they wanted him to wait a year so his fee can drop a little City got him instead, I bet now their kicking themselves since they rely on 2, 33 year old on the wings.

I think this summers transfer is a little more difficult then people think, City have 13 players who are 30 and over, players that are hard to sell, especially since some of their contracts are running down some clubs are probably waiting till their free to take instead. City probably also have some form of wage bill in place and amount they don't want to exceed, Nasri/Bony/Hart combined are making £330K weekly, while Kompany is making £120K and Yaya £220K, so weekly City are paying £670K on players who aren't apart of Pep plan, one has injury problems while the other is 33 years old. These players are also hard to sell because clubs probably don't want to pay them the money they want. Bony is getting paid 100K, how many clubs will pay him that?

Sane is making £55K weekly, as bad as Bravo is I saw that he's only making £10K, Stones is £100K, Gundo £120K, Nolito £100K, Jesus is probably earning a little less then £100K I would believe.

Perhaps City and Pep were in the market, but they had a hard time tracking actually proper talent. Outside of Bravo and maybe Nolito I don't think City had a bad transfer window tbh they may have not strengthen what they needed it, but that doesn't mean the transfer window was bad in itself.

Have you plucked those wages from thin air?

I will answer your question on Bony though - none
 
Have you plucked those wages from thin air?

I will answer your question on Bony though - none

No.

http://www.totalsportek.com/money/manchester-city-player-salaries/

http://sillyseason.com/salary/manchester-city-players-salaries-69071/

http://footballplayerpro.com/manchester-city-player-salaries/

Not saying these are entirely accurate. I was curious about my own club and their wage structures, etc, so did a little research then thought about it when I heard users talking about City transfers I went to look into their player wages.
 
No.

http://www.totalsportek.com/money/manchester-city-player-salaries/

http://sillyseason.com/salary/manchester-city-players-salaries-69071/

http://footballplayerpro.com/manchester-city-player-salaries/

Not saying these are entirely accurate. I was curious about my own club and their wage structures, etc, so did a little research then thought about it when I heard users talking about City transfers I went to look into their player wages.

According to that, we're paying Boyata 70 grand a week.
That's six times as much as Bravo, a player that actually plays for us.
 
Surely that would make him just about the lowest paid first choice keeper in the Premier League? It may be correct but I would be amazed if he'd left Barca for that wage.

According to that, we're paying Boyata 70 grand a week.
That's six times as much as Bravo, a player that actually plays for us.

lmao I know as I said I don't know if its all accurate, but I think some of it is. There 3 different sites that list Bravo at 10K, unless they forgot to add another 0 and the other sites took it off one of those site.

http://sportsmaza.com/football/manchester-city-players-salary/

This shows he's actually at 100K, so it was probably a typo.
 
lmao I know as I said I don't know if its all accurate, but I think some of it is. There 3 different sites that list Bravo at 10K, unless they forgot to add another 0 and the other sites took it off one of those site.
Actually I'm going to assume they are correct and haven't missed off a 0, it'll make me marginally less fed up.
 
lmao I know as I said I don't know if its all accurate, but I think some of it is. There 3 different sites that list Bravo at 10K, unless they forgot to add another 0 and the other sites took it off one of those site.

The fact that they don't even know that he doesn't play for us is enough to tell you that they are talking out of their fucking arses.
I won't even bother with Richard Wright.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top