The problem with the view that RM are "Kings of this competition for a reason perhaps" is that no-one can say what that reason is! They have won the competition 5 times in the last 10/11 years and 14 times in all, going back to 1955. Even if we confine ourselves to the years since 2014 and their 6 wins, they have had a series of different managers and a host of different managers. This raises the question of what exactly the reason for their success is! We have never been treated to an explanation which is in any way convincing, and increasingly we are thrown back on the kind of lunatic explanations of the rags' success in the nineties and noughties: "winning is in their genes", "it's part of their DNA" or "there's success built into the badge" and of course "they always find a way". But, of course, they've lost their way now! And RM did not win it between 1960 and 1998. Then it was the galacticos and 3 wins, then another "fallow" period until 2914. So, they don't ALWAYS find a way to win and we don't always find a way to lose. RM certainly didn't in 2020! It's fair to point out that in 10 CL matches against them since 2016 Madrid have won 1 in 90 minutes and 2 if extra time is included. They have never found a way to win at the Etihad. And if we think back two years part of their strategy was for City to miss a string of chances at the Bernabeu culminating in a prone Courtois scraping one off the line with his studs with the score at 1-0 to City. That is before RM's "way" to win in the final was for the goalkeeper to be man of the match ... On Wednesday RM certainly didn't plan to have 30% possession, let Haaland hit the bar and the rebound go fractionally wide, KdB to put a golden chance over the bar... We can criticise City's finishing, but we have to say that RM seem to have the rub of the green and the run of the ball at some very important times.