You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Reception for Mark Hughes...
- Thread starter CITY FOR LIFE
- Start date
LoveCity said:Why would the reception be any different than the massive ovation he got after the Sunderland game when he gave that farewell? I would cheer him, he may have been a rag but he wasn't one of those "through and through" rags who cares about nothing else and grew attached to our club while he was here.
Pretty much agree with this.
He might have been a rag but he wasnt one of the ones I really hated. I wanted him to do well at city and was sad when he got the sack.
The rest is history but I'll give him a cheer.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Hang on a minute here guys....
Hughes?.....Fulham?.....
Rubbish....Bollox.....Not having it.....!
We were assured when we got rid of the useless T**T that we were making the biggest mistake EVER in getting rid of the RAG agent and that it was only a matter of time before Barca....no sorry, Real Madrid...... or some other stella team would snap him up and allow him to go on and dominate the game for many years to come!
He must not have fancied them jobs eh?
Fulham!?!? pmsl.
Hughes?.....Fulham?.....
Rubbish....Bollox.....Not having it.....!
We were assured when we got rid of the useless T**T that we were making the biggest mistake EVER in getting rid of the RAG agent and that it was only a matter of time before Barca....no sorry, Real Madrid...... or some other stella team would snap him up and allow him to go on and dominate the game for many years to come!
He must not have fancied them jobs eh?
Fulham!?!? pmsl.
MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
Had the takeover not happened, he would have been a good manager for us, as we as a club would have had similar expectations and of a level on par with Fulham.
However, he was never the manager for City once we were aiming that much higher. His managerial skills aren't at that level. (Yet?)
He did his best, and as stated elswhere, his passion during the derbies showed he wanted to beat them badly.
Anything other than a good reception would reflect badly on US, the supporters and look piss poor and give the media and our detractors more ammo.
However, he was never the manager for City once we were aiming that much higher. His managerial skills aren't at that level. (Yet?)
He did his best, and as stated elswhere, his passion during the derbies showed he wanted to beat them badly.
Anything other than a good reception would reflect badly on US, the supporters and look piss poor and give the media and our detractors more ammo.
fast eddie
Well-Known Member
Who's the last Manager we had who came back to City with another Club? I don't recall Keegan back at The COMS during his final brief spell with Newcastle and then there's Pearce or Royle. Struggling to think of one.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Brian horton with Hull and Peter Reid with Stoke, although both were assistants. We didn't make a particular fuss over those two.fast eddie said:Who's the last Manager we had who came back to City with another Club? I don't recall Keegan back at The COMS during his final brief spell with Newcastle and then there's Pearce or Royle. Struggling to think of one.
Aussie!
Well-Known Member
The more appropriate question would be 'Why shouldn't we give Mark a good reception?'
salfordtrueblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 1,335
As fans if we want to show Character/history/sincerity then we should give him a lovely warm reception......if we want to behave like brainless/bitter Neanderthal dummies we could scream rag obscenities at him........I expect more of the latter sadly.