Red Cafe in meltdown

[levets]

Obsessed , much…
View attachment 178917

Now… it would be a bit ho-hum to just accept at face value.

So, the link is

International attendance ranking (Detailed view)

The international attendance ranking shows the clubs with the highest attendances in an international comparison.

www.transfermarkt.com

Which does indeed show City as 26th:
View attachment 178919

46556 average league home attendance? Sounded very low.

Googling for City home attendance in 25/26 gives


View attachment 178920
… which is the average I’d expect to see.

And is confirmed by adding up the PL attendances from:
View attachment 178921

So, what does that make us in the Top 5 leagues average attendance stakes? Well using the 52391 means we are 18th just above Newcastle.

Still not good?
Actually pretty good, because, like Newcastle, we are butting up against the Stadium capacity with our average attendance.
All the teams above us have higher capacities, so you would hope that their average attendance was higher!
Ie there’s no way we could get a better average attendance, unless we fiddled the figures, as per our neighbours in Trafford…

Did anyone spot the average attendance in Trafford on the worldfootball link?
Well, before we laugh out loud, I can say it’s likely due to missing numbers of attendances in 2 matches, but still dividing by the total matches played.
View attachment 178925

I’d say a similar thing has happened to the nonsense figure of our average attendance on the original transfermarkt link (that the Trafford idiot posted). I think the al-hilal friendly and/or the Brentford LC match crowd has been used to get a much lower average, or they have simply missed off a match attendance , but still included the match (with zero attendance) in the average calculation.

Anyway tldr;
1. Don’t just believe figures on a website, check.
2. Don’t ever take a Trafford fan’s thoughts as gospel.
3. Make sure you understand the correlation between capacity and attendance.

So how do they arrive at 46,556? It states League matches. It also has our capacity wrongly stated. This site has always been iffy

 

[Kinkybyname]

So how do they arrive at 46,556? It states League matches. It also has our capacity wrongly stated. This site has always been iffy

what does it fkn matter - never confuse quantity with quality, us FOCs remember the ad, 98 per cent of people can't tell Stork from butter. Rags obsessed with size... tells you all you need to know

 

[levets]

what does it fkn matter - never confuse quantity with quality, us FOCs remember the ad, 98 per cent of people can't tell Stork from butter. Rags obsessed with size... tells you all you need to know

True about rags… but this is compiled by idiots at transfermarket.com. I don’t see where the come up with that average figure, given our lowest is stated as 51,785

 

[levets]

From the WSL City vs United thread
View attachment 174981

Does every United poster have a missing ‘irony’ gland?

It’s noticeable, finally, when there’s a City supporting commentator… but let’s just forget the past 2+ decades of red cartel dominated pundits and whinge about a single ‘we’ compared to the avalanche of Biased crap spouted by Neville, Spitty, keown et al!

Thick fucker doesn’t know she works for the club as an ambassador… so she’s right to refer to City as ‘we’

 

[Gesario]

Thick fucker doesn’t know she works for the club as an ambassador… so she’s right to refer to City as ‘we’

SCUM Yesssssssssssss