Charming.Bollocks
Charming.Bollocks
oliver was a fuckin disgrace, didn't even try ho hide his corruption, and as for the none penalty ffs,
olivers got form, check this at 5.21
So a penalty then.He did just nick the ball first before taking him out
AgreedSo a penalty then.
Ah, but even though he made contact with the ball the follow through caught him so it's a red for John Stones, oh hang on I'm thinking of another rule......it was a cast iron pen, Arlo & Dixon were laughing that it hadn't been given on my feed....which has absolutely ZERO relevance as to whether or not it's a foul/penalty.
You've been watching too much Sky/BT football mate, and have swallowed the bullshit reasoning they peddle.
It's the same as when they used to say "there was contact, he's got every right to go down, it's a penalty" which was also bullshit and never in the rules, but after they peddled their biased bollocks reasoning, EVERYBODY repeated it ad infinitum.
100% penalty by the LotG for us today.
The manipulation of the play on rule is classic game management. It can be used by a referee who wants to avoid booking players from a particular team. It can also be used to avoid even giving a foul when the attacking team have no obvious advantage. It's corruption, and it is BLATANTLY obvious.Oliver was a disgrace today, twice we had players taken out but Oliver waved play on. Didn’t go back and book them after. Absolute disgrace
They were trying to do Kev here
You're not really amazed though are you?This was a typical Crap7 response to being outplayed.
So there's already a decision made - doesn't give players the right to do that. I was amazed VAR didn't call for a review
No - sadly - you're right :). I should think harder before posting that where we're concerned lolYou're not really amazed though are you?