Blue back home
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 May 2015
- Messages
- 408
Bent as fuck. Result was decided ages ago. #skypayroll
But he had his moment to let the decision stand and bottled it.I agree with Bernardo completely.
I thought Taylor had a very good game, and he created a very good game of football by the way he reffed it, but VAR has to interfere, and the whole point of football, goals, is spoiled by it.
It’s City mate,so we have our goals scrutinised more than any other team looking for any reason possible to disallow them,as soon as we scored the wife and 2 sons were celebrating,I knew just knew it,they would review it and disallow it ..Needless to say, it was a joke that our goal got ruled out. Worse challenges were let go all game.
4 players touched the ball after the 'foul', how far can you go back to rule a goal out, just a joke.
Natural feeling when in LiverpoolWhy?
Cause he knew what he was doing brilliant game management from the ref ..And why was the game pulled back to send Klopp off when we were on the attack.. let the play conclude then go back and send Bingo off. Really pissed me that did
Ray Winstone? Alf Garnet?I really hope that West Ham fan doesn't start with his bollocks tonight.
Nothing wrong with VAR. It's being manipulated to suit the result.It’s a shame because the way he refereed that today was brilliant at time. Letting it go, it made for a really entertaining watch.
The thing that gets me is VAR. It ruins football. Football isn’t supposed to be perfect so why bring something in to do that? It’s a tackle Taylor let go the full 90 but because VAR looked at it, it’s one that’s scrutinised.
Was it clear and obvious? Was it fuck.
VAR is clearly and obviously killing the beautiful game. IMO.
Freddie Foreman.Ray Winstone? Alf Garnet?
I don't have a full understanding of the rules anymore so I was wondering, if two players are tussling for the ball, one player uses his arm and upper body strength to knock the other off balance resulting in the falling player holding the other players shirt for less than a second, what laws of the game have been breached? Who gets awarded the foul, the player that initiated the contact or the one falling over? What part of the VAR 'clear and obvious' guidelines would this decision affect? If a referee has let contact and physicality go all game where in the guidance does it say that if a goal is scored and there may have been physical contact in the build up that a referee should be instructed to view the 'incident' on the monitor with a view of disallowing a goal even though this decision is in stark contrast to the decisions he has made all game?Yes. What aren’t you understanding?
Ray Winstone? Alf Garnet?
They said the same on 5Live.Am I the only one who thinks the Thiago foul on Rodri was a straight red? Two footed, reckless, out of control, taking out his standing leg...
Taylor’s view was that it wasn’t a foul and that’s why he let it go along with the other body to body challenges from both teams.I agree with Bernardo completely.
I thought Taylor had a very good game, and he created a very good game of football by the way he reffed it, but VAR has to interfere, and the whole point of football, goals, is spoiled by it.
But they don’t have toThey invariably do