Ref Watch

[Millwallawayveteran1988]

I believe we have the Joys of Michael Oliver tomorrow!

 

[mat]

I believe we have the Joys of Michael Oliver tomorrow!

West ham defence could spit roast Bernie in the penalty area and he'd give them an indirect free kick for obstruction.

 

[David Kloppesh]

twat!

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

another penalty not given, but the stats are pretty even the bog standard decisions were evenly dished out, just the usual big call we don't get.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

another penalty not given, but the stats are pretty even the bog standard decisions were evenly dished out, just the usual big call we don't get.

What about the foul on Cancelo that was more a blatant yellow card than the one Cancelo got booked for?

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

What about the foul on Cancelo that was more a blatant yellow card than the one Cancelo got booked for?

I wasn't watching closely, so the pen was the only thing I noticed.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

No real issues with him today but Oliver is one slimy **** of an individual in my book and has fucked us over on a number of occasions notably against the dippers.

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

Anyway, stats for fairness:
1st half:
City - 14 attempted tackles, 3 fouls, 4.67.
WHU - 7 attempted tackles, 2 fouls, 3.5.

70 minutes:
City - 21 attempted tackles, 4 fouls, 5.25.
WHU - 17 attempted tackles, 3 fouls, 5.67.

Full-time:
City - 34 attempted tackles, 7 fouls, 4.85.
WHU - 28 attempted tackles, 6 fouls, 4.67.

Very even-handed statistically, although more lenient on West Ham second-half but they made more of an effort tackling wise so 2 out of 7 isn't really significant. It's more those big calls today with WallyVAR.

Also shows that in 2 largely similar games in terms of having 1 dominant team (Rags and West Ham), just how wildly different the same ref refereed each game. At this level, the least you'd expect is the referee to be experienced enough to be consistent and disciplined and average similar amounts, yet there's gulf here.

 

[bluealf]

Anyway, stats for fairness:
1st half:
City - 14 attempted tackles, 3 fouls, 4.67.
WHU - 7 attempted tackles, 2 fouls, 3.5.

70 minutes:
City - 21 attempted tackles, 4 fouls, 5.25.
WHU - 17 attempted tackles, 3 fouls, 5.67.

Full-time:
City - 34 attempted tackles, 7 fouls, 4.85.
WHU - 28 attempted tackles, 6 fouls, 4.67.

Very even-handed statistically, although more lenient on West Ham second-half but they made more of an effort tackling wise so 2 out of 7 isn't really significant. It's more those big calls today with WallyVAR.

Also shows that in 2 largely similar games in terms of having 1 dominant team (Rags and West Ham), just how wildly different the same ref refereed each game. At this level, the least you'd expect is the referee to be experienced enough to be consistent and disciplined and average similar amounts, yet there's gulf here.

They are experienced, experienced in doing what they are told to do.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

Must have been praying he couuld call it off.